J. BACON & SONS
v.
MARTIN, COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE
J. BACON & SONS
MARTIN, COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE
302 U.S. 642
Supreme Court of the United States (1937)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Per_curiam
Appeal from the Court of Appeals of Kentucky.
Per Curiam:
The appeal herein is dismissed as it does not appear from the record that there is a final judgment. Haseltine v. Central Bank of Springfield (No. 1), 183 U. S. 130, 131; McComb, Executor, v. Commissioners, 91 U. S. 1; Moore v. Robbins, 18 Wall. 688; McGourkey v. Toledo & Ohio Central Ry. Co., 146 U. S. 536, 545; Union Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Kirchoff, 160 U. S. 374, 378; Great Western Telegraph Co. v. Burnham, 162 U. S. 339, 345, 346; American Bakeries Co. v. Huntsville, 299 U. S. 514.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hughes v. Wis. Tax Comm'n, 304 U.S. 548 (U.S. 1938)…ssed for the want of a properly presented substantial federal question. (1) Hiawassee Power Co. v. Carolina-Tenn. Co., 252 U. S. 341, 344; Whitney v. California, 274 U. S. 357, 360; White River Co. v. Arkansas, 279 U. S. 692, 700; Morris v. Alabama, 302 U. S. 642. (2) Lawrence v. State Tax Commission, 286 U. S. 276, 279-281; New York ex rel. Cohn v. Graves, 300 U. S. 308, 313.…
-
Crescent Creamery, Inc. v. Milk Control Bd., 305 U.S. 559 (U.S. 1938)…Per Curiam: The appeal herein is dismissed as it does not appear from the record that there is a final judgment. J. Bacon & Sons v. Martin, Commissioner of Revenue, 302 U. S. 642.…
-
Dromey v. Wis. Tax Comm'n, 304 U.S. 548 (U.S. 1938)…ssed for the want of a properly presented substantial federal question. (1) Hiawassee Power Co. v. Carolina-Tenn. Co., 252 U. S. 341, 344; Whitney v. California, 274 U. S. 357, 360; White River Co. v. Arkansas, 279 U. S. 692, 700; Morris v. Alabama, 302 U. S. 642; (2) Lawrence v. State Tax Commission, 286 U. S. 276, 279-281; New York ex rel. Cohn v. Graves, 300 [*549] U. S. 308, 313; Mitchell v. United States, 21 Wall. 350, 353. Mr. S. W. Jensch for appellant. Mr. Joseph E. Messerschmidt for respondents.…
Authorities Cited
- McGOURKEY v. Toledo & Ohio Cent. Ry. Co., 146 U.S. 536 (U.S. 1892)
- Haseltine v. Cent. Bank OF Springfield, 183 U.S. 130 (U.S. 1901)
- Great W. Tel. Co. v. Burnham, 162 U.S. 339 (U.S. 1896)
- McComb v. Comm'rs of Knox Cnty., 91 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1875)
- Union Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Kirchoff, 160 U.S. 374 (U.S. 1896)
- Am. Bakeries Co. v. Huntsville, 299 U.S. 514 (U.S. 1936)