DROMEY, ADMINISTRATOR
v.
WISCONSIN TAX COMMISSION ET AL.
DROMEY, ADMINISTRATOR
WISCONSIN TAX COMMISSION ET AL.
304 U.S. 548
Supreme Court of the United States (1938)
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a properly presented substantial federal question. (1) Hiawassee Power Co. v. Carolina-Tenn. Co., 252 U. S. 341, 344; Whitney v. California, 274 U. S. 357, 360; White River Co. v. Arkansas, 279 U. S. 692, 700; Morris v. Alabama, 302 U. S. 642; (2) Lawrence v. State Tax Commission, 286 U. S. 276, 279-281; New York ex rel. Cohn v. Graves, 300 U. S. 308, 313; Mitchell v. United States, 21 Wall. 350, 353.
Mr. S. W. Jensch for appellant.
Mr. Joseph E. Messerschmidt for respondents.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Whitney v. California, 274 U.S. 357 (U.S. 1927)
- Lawrence v. State Tax Comm'n of Miss., 286 U.S. 276 (U.S. 1932)
- Mitchell v. United States, 21 Wall. 350 (U.S. 1874)
- NEW York ex rel. Cohn v. Graves, 300 U.S. 308 (U.S. 1937)
- Hiawassee River Power Co. v. Carolina-Tennessee Power Co., 252 U.S. 341 (U.S. 1920)
- White River Lumber Co. v. Arkansas Ex rel. Applegate, 279 U.S. 692 (U.S. 1929)
- J. Bacon & Sons v. Martin, 302 U.S. 642 (U.S. 1937)
- Morris v. Alabama, 302 U.S. 642 (U.S. 1937)