CRESCENT CREAMERY, INC., ET AL.
v.
MILK CONTROL BOARD ET AL.

U.S. | 1938-10-10
No. 238
305 U.S. 559 Supreme Court of the United States (1938) Negative Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed as it does not appear from the record that there is a final judgment. J. Bacon & Sons v. Martin, Commissioner of Revenue, 302 U. S. 642.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (U.S. 1965)
    …23, this Court held that “Our recent decisions make plain that we do not sit as a superlegislature to weigh the wisdom of legislation nor to decide whether the policy which it expresses offends the public welfare.” Compare Gardner v. Massachusetts, 305 U. S. 559, which the Court today apparently overrules, which held that a challenge under the Federal Constitution to a state law forbidding the sale or furnishing of contraceptives did not raise a substantial federal question. Brother Harlan, who has consist…
  • Friedman v. Markendorf, 309 U.S. 627 (U.S. 1940)
    …Per Curiam: The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Gardner v. Massachusetts, 305 U. S. 559; Gray v. Connecticut, 159 U. S. 77; Roschen v. Ward, 279 U. S. 337; Semler v. Dental Examiners, 294 U. S. 608, 611.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw