EARL L. STAGER, PETITIONER,
v.
FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY COMPANY, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, RESPONDENT
By petition for a writ of certiorari we are requested to review a decision of the Court of Appeal, Third District, because of alleged conflicts with prior decisions of this Court and other District Courts. Stager v. Florida East Coast Railway Company, 163 So.2d 15.
We have thoroughly examined the record and briefs, and have heard oral arguments. This careful consideration of the matter has led us to conclude that the petitioner has failed to demonstrate any conflict of deci*541sions sufficient to activate the jurisdiction, of this Court.
The writ was improvidently issued, so it is therefore discharged.
It is so ordered.
DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Fogel v. Mirmelli, 413 So. 2d 1204 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)…as been exercised ei [*1208] ther by pre-trial order or at least under circumstances which give the parties prior notice of the limitations imposed. See, e.g., Stager v. Florida East Coast Railway Co., 163 So. 2d 15 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964), cert. denied, 174 So. 2d 540 (Fla.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 878, 86 S.Ct. 162, 15 L.Ed.2d 119 (1965). Rule 1.200(a)(4) Florida Rule of Civil Procedure, expressly provides that at the pre-trial conference the court may determine the limitation of the number of expert witnesses.…
-
Johnson Cason and Christine Cason v. Smith, 365 So. 2d 1042 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)…ke a proffer which would demonstrate that the proposed evidence was improperly excluded would prevent appellate consideration or acceptance of the point. E.g., Stager v. Florida East Coast R. Co., 163 So. 2d 15, 17 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1964), cert. disch., 174 So. 2d 540 (Fla.1965). In this case, however, this requirement cannot obtain because the record shows, for reasons that need not be detailed, that the trial judge effectively interfered with the plaintiffs’ ability to complete any proffer they wished to make.…
-
Stager v. Fla. E. Coast Ry. Co., 189 So. 2d 192 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966)…he cause remanded with directions to enter an order not inconsistent with this decision. Reversed and remanded. . Stager v. Florida East Coast Railway Company, Fla.App.1964, 163 So. 2d 15. . Stager v. Florida East Coast Railway Company, Fla.1965, 174 So. 2d 540. . Stager v. Florida East Coast Railway Company, 382 U.S. 878, 86 S.Ct. 162, 15 L.Ed.2d 119. . § 55.03, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. reads as follows : “Judgments; rate of interest, generally “All judgments (and decrees) shall bear interest at the rate of…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Stager v. Fla. E. Coast Ry. Co., 163 So. 2d 15 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964)