ILLINOIS EX REL. EITEL ET AL.
v.
TOMAN ET AL.; AND ILLINOIS EX REL. SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO. V. SAME
ILLINOIS EX REL. EITEL ET AL.
TOMAN ET AL.; AND ILLINOIS EX REL. SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO. V. SAME
308 U.S. 505
Supreme Court of the United States (1939)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeals are dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. League v. Texas, 184 U. S. 156, 161-162; Kentucky Union Co. v. Kentucky, 219 U. S. 140, 152-153; Satterlee v. Matthewson, 2 Pet. 378, 413; Violet Trapping Co. v. Grace, 297 U. S. 119, 120; Ingraham v. Hanson, 297 U. S. 378, 381; Schenebeck v. McCrary, 298 U. S. 36, 37.
Mr. Justice Stone and Mr. Justice Roberts took no part in the consideration or decision of No. 297.
Reported below: 371 Ill. 367; 21 N. E. 2d 318.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
S. Serv. Co., Ltd. v. Cnty. of Los Angeles, 310 U.S. 610 (U.S. 1940)…Per Curiam: The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. (1) Graham & Foster v. Goodcell, 282 U. S. 409, 429-430; Eitel v. Toman, 308 U. S. 505; Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Toman, 308 U. S. 505. (2) Ohio Oil Co. v. Conway, 281 U. S. 146, 159; Railroad Co. v. Commissioners, 98 U. S. 541, 543-544; Chesebrough v. United States, 192 U. S. 253, 259-260.…1 / 2
Authorities Cited
- Ky. Union Co. v. Commonwealth of Ky., 219 U.S. 140 (U.S. 1911)
- League v. Texas, 184 U.S. 156 (U.S. 1902)
- Violet Trapping Co., Inc. v. Grace, 297 U.S. 119 (U.S. 1936)
- Ingraham v. Hanson, 297 U.S. 378 (U.S. 1936)
- Schenebeck v. McCRARY, 298 U.S. 36 (U.S. 1936)