TRUSTEES OF PILLSBURY ACADEMY
v.
MINNESOTA
TRUSTEES OF PILLSBURY ACADEMY
MINNESOTA
308 U.S. 506
Supreme Court of the United States (1939)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgments of the Supreme Court of Minnesota are affirmed. Violet Trapping Co. v. Grace, 297 U. S. 119, 120; Ingraham v. Hanson, 297 U. S. 378, 381; Schenebeck v. McCrary, 298 U. S. 36, 37. Mr. Justice Black took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
In re Advisory Opinion TO THE Governor, 509 So. 2d 292 (Fla. 1987)…ded that the classification is reasonable, nonarbitrary, and rests on some ground of difference having a fair and substantial relation to the object of the legislation. State ex rel. Vars v. Knott, 135 Fla. 206, 184 So. 752 (1938), appeal dismissed, 308 U.S. 506, 60 S.Ct. 72, 84 L.Ed.2d 433 (1939), vacated on other grounds, 308 U.S. 507, 60 S.Ct 72, 84 L.Ed. 434 (1939). We cannot say that the distinctions which the act draws are arbitrary. Rather, the exemptions granted for legal services provided to indi…
-
Setzer v. Mayo, 150 Fla. 734 (Fla. 1942)…holesome food. Such statutes were designed to prevent fraud and protect the public health by prohibiting the manufacture and sale of foods that are injurious to the latter. Carolene Products Company v. Wallace, et al., 27 Fed. Supp. 110, affirmed in 308 U. S. 506, 60 Sup. Ct. 113, 84 L. Ed. 433; Hebe Company, et al., v. Shaw, et al., 248 U. S. 297, 39 Sup. Ct. 125, 63 L. Ed. 255; United States v. Carolene Products Company, 304 U. S. 144, 58 Sup. Ct. 778, 82 L. Ed. 1234; Carolene Products Company, et al., v.…1 / 2
-
Doyle Conner v. Cone, 235 So. 2d 492 (Fla. 1970)…ase. United States v. Carolene Products Co., supra, and cases cited. “This opinion is planted squarely on the doctrine of the last cited case and the case of Carolene Products Co. v. Wallace et al., D.C., 27 F.Supp. 110, affirmed without opinion in 308 U.S. 506, 60 S.Ct. 113, 84 L.Ed. 433, and as we interpret these cases, it is not sufficient to prove that cotton seed oil and other substitutes for butter fat are wholesome and nutritious, if it is shown that in addition to being wholesome and nutritious, th…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Violet Trapping Co., Inc. v. Grace, 297 U.S. 119 (U.S. 1936)
- Ingraham v. Hanson, 297 U.S. 378 (U.S. 1936)
- Schenebeck v. McCRARY, 298 U.S. 36 (U.S. 1936)