LESTER FREDEL, APPELLANT,
v.
FLORENCE FREDEL, APPELLEE
LESTER FREDEL, APPELLANT,
FLORENCE FREDEL, APPELLEE
175 So. 2d 218
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1965)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
The appellant, former husband, presents for review the financial provisions of a decree of divorce. The sole point presented is that the chancellor erred in requiring alimony and child support in the amounts set. The appellant has failed to show an abuse of discretion by the chancellor and the decree is affirmed upon the rule stated in Pross v. Pross, Fla.1954, 72 So.2d 671, 672.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Metro. Dade Cnty. v. Sergeant Gerald Mingo, 339 So. 2d 302 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)…edural due process had been accorded, whether essential requirements of law had been observed and whether the charges were supported by substantial, competent evidence. City of Miami v. Babey, 161 So. 2d 230 (Fla.3rd DCA 1964); McGuaran v. Susskind, 175 So. 2d 218 (Fla.3rd DCA 1965). The question of the weight and credibility of the evidence is for the administrative agency and not the reviewing court, even though the court may have reached a different conclusion on the same testimony. McFall v. Florida State…
-
Campbell v. Vetter, 392 So. 2d 6 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980)…s been accorded, whether the essential requirements of law have been observed, and whether the decision is supported by substantial competent [*8] evidence. Metropolitan Dade County v. Mingo, 339 So. 2d 302 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1976); McGuaran v. Susskind, 175 So. 2d 218 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1965); City of Miami v. Babey, 161 So. 2d 230 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1964). In its review capacity, a circuit court may not reevaluate conflicts in the evidence to determine whether there is substantial competent evidence to support the decisio…
-
Nichols v. City OF Hialeah, 183 So. 2d 611 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966)…her the petitioner had been accorded procedural due process, and whether there was a failure by the Personnel Board to comply with the essential requirements of law. De Groot v. Sheffield, Fla.1957, 95 So. 2d 912; McGuaran v. Susskind, Fla.App.1965, 175 So. 2d 218. See In re Edwards, 100 Fla. 989, 130 So. 615 (1930). These are questions of law, and the evidence is considered only upon the allegation that the record fails to reveal any competent substantial evidence to support the decision of the quasi judicia…1 / 2
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Pross v. Pross, 72 So. 2d 671 (Fla. 1954)