FRANK BENEFIELD
v.
STATE
FRANK BENEFIELD
STATE
123 Fla. 1
Florida Supreme Court (1936)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 165 So. 897
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
The writ of error brings for review j’udgment of conviction of the offense of breaking and entering a building with intent to commit a felony, to-wit, with the intent to commit grand larceny.
The only question presented for our determination is whether or not there is sufficient evidence to support the verdict and as the record discloses ample substantial evidence to support the verdict and j'udgment, the j'udgment should be affirmed.
It is so ordered.
Affirmed.
Ellis, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
*2Whitfield, C. J., and Davis, J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Woodcock v. Harton, 146 Fla. 16 (Fla. 1941)…and county tax sale certificate. No new or novel questions are presented. No reversible error appearing in the record, the decree should be affirmed on authority of the opinion and judgment [*17] in Pershing Hotel Co., Inc., v. Stark, 123 Fla. 26, 165 Sou. 897; Burns, et al., v. Campbell, 131 Fla. 630, 180 Sou. 46, and Inter-City Security Co., et al., v. Barbee, 106 Fla. 671, 143 Sou. 791. It is so ordered. Affirmed. Brown, C. J., Whitfield, Buford and Adams, J. J., concur'.…