O. P. WOODCOCK, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
LEON J. C. HARTON, APPELLEE
O. P. WOODCOCK, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
LEON J. C. HARTON, APPELLEE
146 Fla. 16
Florida Supreme Court (1941)
Negative Treatment
Also reported at: 200 So. 372
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
Appeal brings for review final decree of foreclosure and previous interlocutory orders in a suit to foreclose a State and county tax sale certificate.
No new or novel questions are presented.
No reversible error appearing in the record, the decree should be affirmed on authority of the opinion and judgment *17in Pershing Hotel Co., Inc., v. Stark, 123 Fla. 26, 165 Sou. 897; Burns, et al., v. Campbell, 131 Fla. 630, 180 Sou. 46, and Inter-City Security Co., et al., v. Barbee, 106 Fla. 671, 143 Sou. 791.
It is so ordered.
Affirmed.
Brown, C. J., Whitfield, Buford and Adams, J. J., concur'.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Haislet v. Crowley, 170 So. 2d 88 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964)…atement of the law as set forth in the ordinance of the city heretofore quoted and in §§ 317.371(3) and 317.381(1), Fla.Stat, F.S.A., and that it is a correct statement of the case law as set forth in Miami Transit Co. v. Karses, 1941, 146 Fla. 163, 200 So. 372. We have examined the authorities cited by the plaintiff both to the trial court and this court.4 We conclude that the subject instruction, as given, is not supported by any authority, that it is not a proper statement of the law and that it was err…
-
Maximus Pagan v. Holman, 195 So. 2d 606 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967)…, such an operator may be held liable, if',, without notice, he stops or decreases speed’ so suddenly that the operator of the following vehicle is not reasonably able to avoid [*608] a collision. Miami Transit Company v. Karses, 1941, 146 Fla. 163, 200 So. 372. However, a sudden stop or decrease in speed without notice may or may not constitute negligence, depending upon the •circumstances: “This is so because a sudden or abrupt stop, which could be the result of negligent operation, could as well result…
-
Georgia-Florida Motor Expresss Co. v. Usher, 84 So. 2d 569 (Fla. 1956)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed on authority of Merchants’ Transportation Company v. Daniel, 109 Fla. 496, 149 So. 401; Povia v. Melvin, Fla.1953, 66 So. 2d 494; Miami Transit Co. v. Karses, 146 Fla. 163, 200 So. 372; also Miller v. Ungar, 149 Fla. 79, 5 So. 2d 598; Brandt v. Dodd, 150 Fla. 635, 8 So. 2d 471. DREW, C. J., and TERRELL, HOB-SON and THORNAL, JJ., concur. THOMAS and O’CONNELL, JJ., dissent. ROBERTS, J., not participating.'…
Authorities Cited
- Inter-City Sec. Co. v. Barbee, 106 Fla. 671 (Fla. 1932)
- Verona Burns v. Minerva Campbell, 131 Fla. 630 (Fla. 1938)
- The Pershing Hotel Co., Inc. v. Stark, 123 Fla. 26 (Fla. 1936)
- Benefield v. State, 123 Fla. 1 (Fla. 1936)