HUBERT VERNON HARDIN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1965-06-08
No. F-541
STURGIS, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K„ and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
176 So. 2d 516 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1965) Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Harris v. State, 162 So.2d 262 (Fla.1964), Lambert v. State, 169 So.2d 374 (Fla.App.1964), Wilder v. State, 156 So.2d 395 (Fla.App.1963), and State v. Weeks, 166 So.2d 892 (Fla.1964).

STURGIS, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K„ and RAWLS, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Hardin v. State, 180 So. 2d 660 (Fla. 1965)
    …Certiorari dismissed without opinion. 176 So. 2d 516.…
  • Pait v. State, 188 So. 2d 15 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966)
    …PEARSON, Judge (concurring specially). I concur in the affirmance on the basis of the reasoning in Rodriguez v. State, Fla.App.1965, 176 So. 2d 516.…
  • Fuller v. State, 294 So. 2d 711 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)
    …n filed pursuant to CrPR 3.850, 33 F.S.A. The State has conceded that the trial court erred in failing to grant an evidentiary hearing in light of the allegations made in the motion to vacate. Following a review of Rodriguez v. State, Fla.App.1965, 176 So. 2d 516, and Taylor v. United States, 8th.Cir. 1960, 282 F. 2d 16, it appears that the trial judge did err in the ruling under review. Therefore, the order summarily denying the motion to vacate be and the same is hereby reversed [*712] and the matter is re…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw