SIP & BOTTLE BAR & LOUNGE, AND HOME INDEMNITY COMPANY, PETITIONERS,
v.
HAZEL ABBEY AND FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS
SIP & BOTTLE BAR & LOUNGE, AND HOME INDEMNITY COMPANY, PETITIONERS,
HAZEL ABBEY AND FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS
177 So. 2d 336
Florida Supreme Court (1965)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date July 30, 1964.
Having heard oral argument, our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.
DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bennett v. Fratus, 177 So. 2d 702 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965)…cision in Bennett v. Fratus, 177 So. 2d 334, opinion filed July 21, 1965. The Supreme Court of Florida has now returned jurisdiction of this cause to us for further consideration in the light of the foregoing decisions. See Bennett v. Fratus, Fla., 177 So. 2d 336, opinion filed July 21, 1965. See also Florida East Coast Railway Company v. Lewis, Fla.App., 167 So. 2d 104. We hereby vacate our prior order denying the petition for certiorari, and dismiss the petition in the exercise of our discretion not to re…
-
Cnty. OF Dade v. Bass, 237 So. 2d 559 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970)…preme Court. See Smith v. Davis, Fla.1970, 231 So. 2d 517; Robertson v. State ex rel. Harty, Fla.1970, 233 So. 2d 633. On authority of Dean v. Deas, Fla. 1959, 116 So. 2d 23; Bennett v. Fratus, Fla.1965, 177 So. 2d 335; Bennett v. Fratus, Fla.1965, 177 So. 2d 336; Frewer v. City of Miami Beach, Fla.1965, 178 So. 2d 702, we return jurisdiction of this cause to the circuit court so it may consider further its judgment of reversal in the light of the Supreme Court decisions quashing the decisions relied on by t…