HELEN H. BENNETT, PETITIONER,
v.
JOHN FRATUS, RESPONDENT

Fla. 3d DCA | 1965-08-17
No. 64-651
Before HENDRY, C. J., and TILLMAN PEARSON and CARROLL, JJ.
177 So. 2d 702 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1965)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that it would not review the interlocutory order at law in the exercise of its discretion.


Facts & Procedural History

Petitioner sought certiorari after the appellate court denied review of an interlocutory order. The Florida Supreme Court returned jurisdiction for re…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for certiorari filed herein was denied November 4, 1964, without *703opinion. Bennett v. Fratus, Fla.App., 168 So.2d 792, Case No. 2. Thereupon petitioner applied to the Supreme Court of Florida for a writ of certiorari directed to this Court. While this latter petition was pending in the Supreme Court of Florida, that court rendered its decision in Crews v. Dobson, 177 So.2d 202, opinion filed July 7, 1965, and its decision in Bennett v. Fratus, 177 So.2d 334, opinion filed July 21, 1965.

The Supreme Court of Florida has now returned jurisdiction of this cause to us for further consideration in the light of the foregoing decisions. See Bennett v. Fratus, Fla., 177 So.2d 336, opinion filed July 21, 1965. See also Florida East Coast Railway Company v. Lewis, Fla.App., 167 So.2d 104.

We hereby vacate our prior order denying the petition for certiorari, and dismiss the petition in the exercise of our discretion not to review the interlocutory order at law which is the subject of the petition. This action is without prejudice to any further action by the trial court consistent with the cases cited above.

It is so ordered.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw