HUNTER, WARDEN,

v.

MARTIN

Citator

Cited By

• Hunter v. Martin, 334 U.S. 302 (U.S. 1948)
  …h Circuit Courts of Appeals are in conflict. Compare United States ex rel. Lombardo v. McDonnell, 153 F. 2d 919; Johnston v. Wright, 137 F. 2d 914; Kirk v. Squier, 150 F. 2d 3; Martin v. Hunter, 165 F. 2d 215. We brought the case here on certiorari, 333 U. S. 854, to resolve the conflict. We think it clear that the purpose of the clause deferring commencement of service of the federal sentence was to prevent conflict between the State and Federal Governments. The present federal imprisonment avoids such con…
• Cont'l Cas. Co. v. Anne Arundel Cmty. Coll., 867 F.2d 800 (4th Cir. 1989)
  …163 F. 2d 417, 426 (4 Cir.1947) (provisions of Fair Labor Standards Act with respect to minimum wages, overtime compensation and liquidated damages are to be read into and become a part of every employment contract subject to the act), cert. denied, 333 U.S. 854, 68 S.Ct. 729, 92 L.Ed. 1135 (1948). Under Maryland law, a trial court’s conclusion that ambiguity exists in a writing is entitled to substantial weight. See Aetna Casualty & Sur. Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indem. Co., 74 Md. App. 539, 544-45, 539 A…