LAUDERHILL DEVELOPMENT CORP., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, AND CHARLES V. LOWERY, APPELLANTS,
v.
E. B. ELLIOTT ADV. CO., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE
LAUDERHILL DEVELOPMENT CORP., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, AND CHARLES V. LOWERY, APPELLANTS,
E. B. ELLIOTT ADV. CO., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE
178 So. 2d 878
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1965)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal by the defendant of a final judgment entered following partial summary final judgments in favor of the plaintiff as to liability and damages in a contract action.
We have considered the several contentions advanced by the appellant and deem them to be without merit.
The record before us on appeal clearly demonstrates the nonexistence of any genuine issues of material fact, and as a matter of law, plaintiff is entitled to relief granted below.
The judgment appealed will therefore stand affirmed.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Escobar v. Escobar, 300 So. 2d 702 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)…ges that it was error for the court not to take evidence on the issue of the proper extent of the father’s right to visitation. The determination of such right is particularly within the trial judge’s discretion. Orlowitz v. Orlowitz, Fla.App. 1965, 178 So. 2d 878. It is a matter that must be decided from all the circumstances and in which the welfare of the child must be the primary consideration. Here, the appellant-wife has not shown an abuse of discretion, especially in view of the fact that she failed to…
-
Marlin v. Marlin, 192 So. 2d 778 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966)…e was allowed, nor does it contain all of the evidence [*779] presented during the proceedings relative to the financial standing of the appellant. We must therefore affirm the decree as to the attorney’s fee. See Orlowitz v. Orlowitz, Fla.App.1965, 178 So. 2d 878. Affirmed.…