CHESTER D. WALTERS AND RUTH F. WALTERS, HIS WIFE, APPELLANTS,
v.
ANTHONY BOSCIA, APPELLEE
CHESTER D. WALTERS AND RUTH F. WALTERS, HIS WIFE, APPELLANTS,
ANTHONY BOSCIA, APPELLEE
179 So. 2d 133
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1965)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
There is no evidence, in the record before us, that the appellant, Chester D. Walters, authorized or ratified the compromise and settlement, enforced by the final judgment from which this appeal is taken. For this reason, and this reason only, the judgment of the Court below is reversed, with directions to proceed to the trial of the cause
SMITH, Acting C. J., ANDREWS, J., and WILLSON, J. H., Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State of Fla. Dep't OF Transp. v. Plunske, 267 So. 2d 337 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972)…ized to enter into stipulations or accept notice1 and that the Department of Transportation did not agree to such stipulation. 3. There is no evidence that appellant authorized or ratified the purported settlement. Walters v. Boscia, Fla.App. 1965, 179 So. 2d 133; Palm Beach Royal Hotel, Inc. v. Breese, Fla.App.1963, 154 So. 2d 698; Bursten v. Green, Fla.App. 1965, 172 So. 2d 472. Finally, it is the policy of the law to encourage and favor the compromise and settlement of controversies when such settlement…
-
Krenis v. James, 26 Fla. Supp. 26 (Dade Cty. Cir. Ct. 1966)…is attorney at any time up to actual acceptance by the client. Osius v. Hastings, 97 So. 2d 623; Palm Beach Royal Hotel v. Breese, 154 So. 2d 698; Bursten v. Green, 172 So. 2d 472; Goff v. Indian Lake Estates, 178 So. 2d 910; and Walters v. Boschia, 179 So. 2d 133. Wherefore, it is ordered and adjudged that the motion by defendant, George Robert James, aforedescribed, be and it is hereby denied, the cause to proceed to trial, upon due notice by counsel for any of the parties.…