PICKETT

v.

TEXAS

Citator

Cited By

• Hall v. Fla. State Dep't OF Pub. Welf. & Anne Curtwright, 226 So. 2d 39 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969)
  …Guire v. Cochran, Fla.1961, 135 So. 2d 226; Hollingshead v. Wainwright, Fla. 1967, 194 So. 2d 577; Ex parte Aulday, 1933, 113 Fla. 70, 151 So. 388; Neel v. Mayo, 1937, 126 Fla. 869, 172 So. 84; Cooper v. Sinclair, Fla.1953, 66 So. 2d 702, cert. den. 340 U.S. 867, 74 S.Ct. 107; 98 L.Ed. 377. . For whatever interest it may have, we take note that in the federal system there is no provision for even notice to parents or legal guardians and no provision for parents’ being made parties under the juvenile delinq…
• United States ex rel. Almeida v. Baldi, 195 F.2d 815 (3d Cir. 1952)
  …ition. Ha-beas corpus was denied by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania in a per curiam opinion and order, no reasons for the denial being stated.11 Application for certiorari was then made to the Supreme Court of the United States and was denied. See 340 U.S. 867, 71 S.Ct. 83, 95 L.Ed. 633. The petition for habeas corpus was then filed in the court below. A very full hearing was had and a good deal of evidence was received. Much of it paralleled that taken at the Smith trial in the Court of Oyer and Termine…