MONROE ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (38 total)

• Odom v. State, 403 So. 2d 936 (Fla. 1981)
  …are relevant, authenticated, and otherwise properly admissible. Todisco v. United States, 298 F. 2d 208 (5th Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 989, 82 S.Ct. 602, 7 L.Ed.2d 527 (1962); Monroe v. United States, 234 F. 2d 49 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 873, 77 S.Ct. 94, 1 L.Ed.2d 76 (1956); Brady v. State, 178 So. 2d 121 (Fla.2d DCA 1965); Gomien v. State, 172 So. 2d 511 (Fla.3d DCA 1965). Although the tape was improper under the interpretation of “unreasonable interception” that we provided in Sarmie…
• State v. Steinbrecher, 409 So. 2d 510 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)
  …e. Odom v. State, 403 So. 2d 936 (Fla.1981), citing Todisco v. United States, 298 F. 2d 208 (9th Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 989, 82 S.Ct. 602, 7 L.Ed.2d 527 (1962); Monroe v. United States, 234 F. 2d 49 (D.C. [*512] Cir. 1956), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 873, 77 S.Ct. 94, 1 L.Ed.2d 76 (1956); Brady v. State, 178 So. 2d 121 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965); Gomien v. State, 172 So. 2d 511 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965). Cf. United States v. Llinas, supra, (partially unintelligible tapes generally admissible). We have listened…
• Brady v. State, 178 So. 2d 121 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965)
  …of partially inaudible or unintelligible recordings, unless the inaudible or unintelligible portions are so substantial as to render the recording as a whole untrustworthy. Monroe v. United States, 1956, 98 U.S.App.D.C. 228, 234 F. 2d 49, cert. den. 352 U.S. 873, 77 S.Ct. 94, 1 L.Ed.2d 76, reh. den. 352 U.S. 937, 77 S.Ct. 219, 1 L.Ed.2d 170; Gomien v. State, Fla.App.1965, 172 So. 2d 511, Third District’s opinion filed February 26, 1965; Wharton’s Criminal Evidence, volume 2, 12th edition, section 695, page…