ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY CO. ET AL.

v.

DIXIE CARRIERS, INC., ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• A. L. Mechling Barge Lines, Inc. v. United States, 368 U.S. 324 (U.S. 1961)
  …amended certificate). Such has been the long-standing practice of this Court in civil cases. See United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U. S. 36, 39-40, n. 2; Cozart v. Wilson, 352 U. S. 884. In Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co. v. Dixie Carriers, Inc., 355 U. S. 179, this Court, having been apprised that the temporary Fourth Section relief order there under attack had been superseded and mooted by a subsequent Commission qrder, vacated the District Court’s judgment and remanded with directions to dismiss the co…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Municipal Light Boards of Reading and Wakefield Massachusetts v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 450 F.2d 1341 (D.C. Cir. 1971)
  …ed Amarillo-Borger but noted that an initial refusal or grant of suspension is nonreviewable. See also, Dixie Carriers, Inc. v. United States, 143 F.Supp. 844 (S.D.Tex.1956) (three-judge court), vacated as moot sub. nom. Atchison, T. & S.F. Ry. Co., 355 U.S. 179, 78 S.Ct. 258, 2 L.Ed.2d 186 (1957) ; of. Seatrain Lines, Inc., v. United States, 168 F.Supp. 819 (S.D.N.Y.1958) (three-judge court) ; Atlantic Coast Line RR Co. v. United States, 173 F.Supp. 871 (E.D.Va.1958) (three-judge court). . Oscar Mayer & C…
• Luckenbach S.S. Co., Inc. v. United States, 364 U.S. 280 (U.S. 1960)
  …pension of rates phase of the dispute, is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court with instructions to dismiss the cause as moot. United States v. Amarillo-Borger Express, 352 U. S. 1028; Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co. v. Dixie Carriers, 355 U. S. 179. With respect to the antitrust phase of the dispute, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed. Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas dissent on the holding of Georgia v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 324 U. S. 439.…