LUCKENBACH STEAMSHIP CO., INC.,
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.

U.S. | 1960-06-27
No. 848
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas dissent on the holding of Georgia v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 324 U. S. 439.
364 U.S. 280 Supreme Court of the United States (1960) Caution
Also reported at: 4 L. Ed. 2d 1719 · 80 S. Ct. 1611 · 1960 U.S. LEXIS 1990 · SCDB 1959-136
Cited by 113 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, so far as it relates to the suspension of rates phase of the dispute, is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court with instructions to dismiss the cause as moot. United States v. Amarillo-Borger Express, 352 U. S. 1028; Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co. v. Dixie Carriers, 355 U. S. 179. With respect to the antitrust phase of the dispute, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas dissent on the holding of Georgia v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 324 U. S. 439.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By (36 total)

  • United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (scrap), 412 U.S. 669 (U.S. 1973)
    …of Georgia R. Co., 236 F. 573, aff’d, 239 F. 718; Freeport Sulphur Co. v. United States, 199 F. Supp. 913; Bison S. S. Corp. v. United States, 182 F. Supp. 63; Luckenbach S. S. Co. v. United States, 179 F. Supp. 605, 609—610, acated in part as moot, 364 U. S. 280; Carlsen v. United States, 107 F. Supp. 398. Similarly, there is no significance in the fact that, unlike Arrow, the injunction in this litigation ran against the Commission as well as the railroads. The only [*692] way in which the Commission coul…
  • Arrow Transp. Co. v. S. Ry. Co., 372 U.S. 658 (U.S. 1963)
    …(D. C. S. D. Ga.), aff’d, 239 F. 718 (C. A. 5th Cir.); Freeport Sulphur Co. v. United States, 199 F. Supp. 913, 916 (D. C. S. D. N. Y.); Luckenbach S. S. Co. v. United States, 179 F. Supp. 605, 609-610 (D. C. D. Del.), vacated in part as moot, 364 U. S. 280; cf. Manhattan Transit Co. v. United States, 24 F. Supp. 174, 177 (D. C. D. Mass.). See also Director General v. Viscose Co., 254 U. S. 498, 502, recognizing on similar grounds that under the Transportation Act of 1920 the District Courts lacked po…
  • Wright v. McMANN, 387 F.2d 519 (2d Cir. 1967)
    …ne is to be applied “only in narrowly limited ‘special circumstances.’ ” Zwickler v. Koota, 389 U.S. —, 88 S.Ct. 391, ler v. Koota, 389 U.S. 241, 88 S.Ct. 391, United States v. Livingston, 179 F.Supp. 9, 12-13 (E.D.S.C.1959), affirmed, 364 U.S. 281, 80 S.Ct. 1611, 4 L.Ed.2d 1719 (1960), and quoted with approval in Zwickler v. Koota, supra, 389 U.S. at [*525] p. 244, 88 S.Ct. at 397; Note, Federal-Question Abstention, supra, especially at 604 n. 3. While the doctrine has not been entirely abnegated and insta…

Previewing 3 of 36 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw