UNITED STATES
v.
HULLEY ET AL.
UNITED STATES
HULLEY ET AL.
358 U.S. 66
Supreme Court of the United States (1958)
Caution
Cited by 20 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The petition for writ of certiorari in this case is granted and judgment reversed and remanded to the Supreme Court of Florida. See United States v. Security Trust & Savings Bank, 340 U. S. 47; United States v. Gilbert Associates, 345 U. S. 361; United States v. New Britain, 347 U. S. 81; United States v. Acri, 348 U. S. 211; United States v. Liverpool & London Ins. Co., 348 U. S. 215; United States v. Scovil, 348 U. S. 218; United States v. Colotta, 350 U. S. 808; United States v. White Bear Brewing Co., 350 U. S. 1010; United States v. Vorreiter, 355 U. S. 15.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Weissman, 135 So. 2d 235 (Fla. 2d DCA 1961)…The same determination has been made with respect to mechanics’ liens under state law. United States v. Colotta, 350 U.S. 808, 100 L.Ed. 725, 76 S.Ct. 82, including one decision applying specifically to the State of Florida, United States v. Hulley, 358 U.S. 66, 3 L.Ed.2d 106, 79 S.Ct. 117. The Florida decisions on the same case are Fla., 102 So. 2d 599, and Fla., 111 So. 2d 38. Federal Court decisions specifically holding that a statutory landlord’s lien for rent was not a specific and perfected lien as…
-
Univ. Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Marlin Dev. Co., 24 Fla. Supp. 145 (Dade Cty. Cir. Ct. 1964)…alman recognizes that though prior in time of record to the tax lien, his is an inchoate right which did not materialize until claim was filed in this suit—and therefore the intervening filing of the tax lien places it ahead of him. U. S. v. Hulley, 358 U. S. 66, 3 L. Ed. 2d 106, 799 S. Ct. 117; U. S. v. Weissmann (Fla. App. 2d 1961), 135 So. 2d 235, 238. The second mortgagee cites Manchester Federal S. & L. Assoc, v. Emery-Waterhouse Co. (S. Ct. N.H. 1959), 153 A. 2d 918, which is an excellent opinion on…
-
Aquilino v. United States, 363 U.S. 509 (U.S. 1960)…ed States v. Colotta, 350 U. S. 808 (1955); United States v. White Bear Brewing Co., 350 U. S. 1010 (1956); United States v. Vorreiter, 355 U. S. 15 (1957); United States v. Ball Construction Co., Inc., 355 U. S. 587 (1958); United States v. Hulley, 358 U. S. 66 (1958). The text of these sections, applicable in the Aquilino case, are set forth in note 1 of the Court's opinion in No. 1, ante, p. 511. The comparable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, §§ 6321 and 6322, applicable in the Durham L…
Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited (11 total)
- United States v. City OF NEW Britain, 347 U.S. 81 (U.S. 1954)
- United States v. Sec. Tr. & Sav. Bank, 340 U.S. 47 (U.S. 1950)
- United States v. Gilbert Assocs., Inc., 345 U.S. 361 (U.S. 1953)
- United States v. Acri, 348 U.S. 211 (U.S. 1955)
- United States v. Liverpool & London & Globe Ins. Co., Ltd., 348 U.S. 215 (U.S. 1955)
- United States v. Scovil, 348 U.S. 218 (U.S. 1955)
- United States v. White Bear Brewing Co., Inc., 350 U.S. 1010 (U.S. 1956)
- Gregory v. United States, 350 U.S. 808 (U.S. 1955)
- Block v. Block, 350 U.S. 808 (U.S. 1955)
- Albanese v. Pierce, 355 U.S. 15 (U.S. 1957)