NOONAN CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., PETITIONER,
v.
FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION ET AL., RESPONDENTS
NOONAN CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., PETITIONER,
FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION ET AL., RESPONDENTS
184 So. 2d 421
Florida Supreme Court (1966)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
We have heard oral argument on the petition for certiorari to review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission dated May 26, 1965, which vacated an order of a deputy commissioner awarding certain compensation benefits, and remanded the cause with directions.
A careful study of the record and briefs leads us to conclude that the writ should be denied.
Attorney’s fees are in order and claimant’s attorney is awarded a fee in the amount of $350.00.
THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, O’CONNELL and BARNS (Retired), JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Parker v. Rinker Materials Corp., 222 So. 2d 203 (Fla. 1969)…e settled. The order of the District Court is quashed, with directions to reinstate the appeal. ERVIN, C. J., ROBERTS, DREW and CARLTON, JJ., and RAWLS, District Judge, concur. . Nolan v. Eshleman, 183 So. 2d 205 (Fla.1966). . Johanson v. Insua, 184 So. 2d 421 (Fla.1966). . Florida Appellate Rule 3.2, subd. f., 1967, reads as follows: “Payment of Costs by Original Plaintiff. No appeal may be taken by the original plaintiff in any suit or proceeding until he shall have first paid all costs that have accr…