MANAIA ET AL.

v.

POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER CO.

Citator

Cited By (17 total)

• State v. Barone, 124 So. 2d 490 (Fla. 1960)
  …dall, 1957, 183 Pa.Super. 603, 133 A. 2d 276, certiorari denied by United States Supreme Court in 355 U.S. 954, 78 S.Ct. 539, 2 L.Ed.2d 530; Brockmueller v. State, 1959, 86 Ariz. 82, 340 P. 2d 992, certiorari denied by United States Supreme Court in 361 U.S. 913, 80 S.Ct. 258, 4 L.Ed.2d 184.…
• Lynch v. Household Fin. Corp., 405 U.S. 538 (U.S. 1972)
  …argument is not persuasive in the context of the Connecticut prejudgment garnishment scheme. Garnishment might serve to make a subsequent judgment effective. Cf. Hill, supra; Manufacturers Record Publishing Co. v. Lauer, 268 F. 2d 187, cert. denied, 361 U. S. 913; Furnish v. Board of Medical Examiners of California, 257 F. 2d 520, cert denied, 358 U. S. 882. But the garnishment was, in this case, an action taken by private parties who were not proceeding under a court’s supervision25 and who were using, as a…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Minn. Amusement Co. v. Larkin, 299 F.2d 142 (8th Cir. 1962)
  …could not be called as a witness. . For discussion on the distinction between the two situations, see Judge Medina’s treatment of the question of apparent authority in Lee v. Jenkins Brothers, 2 Cir., 1959, 268 F. 2d 857, 863-871, certiorari denied 361 U.S. 913, 80 S.Ct. 257, 4 L.Ed.2d 183. . It will be noted from tlie contracts between the presidents of the defendant and the defendant that the limitation on authority went to “employment of or contract with any person for employment” and has no reference…