J. W. WHITICE
v.
STATE
J. W. WHITICE
STATE
125 Fla. 221
Florida Supreme Court (1936)
Also reported at: 169 So. 927
Opinion of the Court
— Upon consideration of the entire record in this cause, we are convinced that the ends of justice require a new trial. So the judgment of the Circuit Court is hereby reversed. See Coker v. State, 83 Fla. 672, 93 Sou. Rep. 176; Howell v. State, 121 Fla. 327, 163 So. 691; Woodward v. State, 113 Fla. 301, 151 So. 509; Pass v. *222State, 121 Fla. 336, 163 So. 583; Davis v. State, 76 Fla. 179; 79 So. 450.
Reversed.
Whitfield, C. J., and Ellis, Terrell, Brown, Buford; and Davis, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Elbert Coker v. State, 83 Fla. 672 (Fla. 1922)
- Reuben Davis and Rachel Smith v. State, 76 Fla. 179 (Fla. 1918)
- Winter Garden Citrus Growers Ass'n v. Willits, 113 Fla. 131 (Fla. 1933)
- Pass v. State, 121 Fla. 336 (Fla. 1935)
- Graham v. Graham, 79 So. 450 (Ala. 1918)
- Woodward v. State, 113 Fla. 301 (Fla. 1933)
- Howell v. State, 121 Fla. 327 (Fla. 1935)
- Moss v. Griscom, 121 Fla. 285 (Fla. 1935)