SCHENKER ET AL.

v.

E. I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS & CO., INC., ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (22 total)

• Pate v. Holman, 341 F.2d 764 (5th Cir. 1965)
  …versed a state court conviction where the accused had failed to request counsel when pleading guilty; Doughty was convicted two years before Gideon’s 1961 conviction. United States ex rel. Durocher v. LaValle, 2 Cir. 1964, 330 F. 2d 303, cert. den’d 377 U.S. 998, 84 S.Ct. 1921, 12 L.Ed.2d 1048, relying on Doughty v. Maxwell, applied Gideon where a defendant pleaded guilty without being apprised of his right to counsel.13 This Court has applied Mapp prospectively, and distinguished it from Griffin where the…
• Smith v. Crouse, 378 U.S. 584 (U.S. 1964)
  …Mr. Justice Harlan, dissenting. In my opinion the question whether Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353, should be given retroactive application is deserving of plenary consideration. Cf. my dissenting opinion in LaVallee v. Durocher, 377 U. S. 998.…
• Harvey v. State OF Miss., 340 F.2d 263 (5th Cir. 1965)
  …to advise a defendant of his right to counsel will invalidate a plea of guilty even in the absence of a showing of prejudice” in both state and federal cases. United States ex rel. Durocher v. LaVallee, 2 Cir. 1964, 330 F. 2d 303, 308, cert. denied, 377 U.S. 998, 84 S.Ct. 1921, 12 L.Ed.2d 1048. It is true that the cases which support appellant’s argument all involved felony convictions, but their rationale does not seem to depend on the often purely formal distinction between felonies and misdemeanors. One…