SMITH

v.

CROUSE, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By (39 total)

• Luck v. United States, 348 F.2d 763 (D.C. Cir. 1965)
  …at conviction under our Code15 accordingly was admissible as “evidence to affect the credit” of the appellant as a witness. I deem further discussion unnecessary. . 116 U.S.App.D.C. 410, 324 F. 2d 442 (1963). . Pea v. United States, 378 U.S. 571, 84 S.Ct. 1929, 12 L.Ed.2d 1040 (1964). If the Supreme Court deemed a remand in order in the Pea case, it certainly is proper here. . 378 U.S. 368, 84 S.Ct. 1774, 12 L.Ed.2d 908 (1964). . Id. at 377, 84 S.Ct. at 1781. . Id. at 380, 84 S.Ct. at 1783. . Id. at 3…
• United States v. Scott, 425 F.2d 55 (9th Cir. 1970)
  …v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 83 S.Ct. 792, 9 L.Ed.2d 799 (1963)); McNerlin v. Denno, 378 U.S. 575, 84 S.Ct. 1933, 12 L.Ed.2d 1041 (1964) (giving retroactivity to Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368, 84 S.Ct. 1774, 12 L.Ed.2d 908 (1964)); Smith v. Crouse, 378 U.S. 584, 84 S.Ct. 1929, 12 L.Ed.2d 1039 (1964) (giving retroactivity to Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353, 83 S.Ct. 814, 9 L.Ed.2d 811 (1963)). . Table D2, attached to the Annual Report of the Director of the Administra- . tive Office for 1969 lists “Cri…
• United States ex rel. Joel Smith v. The Hon. Daniel McMANN, 417 F.2d 648 (2d Cir. 1969)
  …Bergan. It is interesting to note that this action was taken by the New York Court of Appeals only shortly before the Supreme Court held on June 22, 1964 that Douglas v. California was to be applied retroactively. Smith v. Crouse, supra, footnote 2, 378 U.S. 584, 84 S.Ct. 1929. On May 17, 1965 applications for writs of certiorari were denied by the Supreme Court in all three cases: 381 U.S. 910 and 920, 85 S.Ct. 1540, 1539, 14 L.Ed.2d 436, 440. The action taken in Márchese was unanimous. In Kling and in Sm…

  ← 1 / 2 →

Authorities Cited

• Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353 (U.S. 1963)
• LaVallee v. Durocher, 377 U.S. 998 (U.S. 1964)
• Schenker v. E. I. duPont de Nemours & Co., Inc., 377 U.S. 998 (U.S. 1964)