ZUCKERMAN ET AL.
v.
GREASON
ZUCKERMAN ET AL.
GREASON
386 U.S. 15
Supreme Court of the United States (1967)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 17 L. Ed. 2d 696 · 87 S. Ct. 847 · 1967 U.S. LEXIS 2273 · SCDB 1966-048
Cited by 3 cases
Topics
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Vacatur Of Judgment cases and more on FLexlaw
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department, for reconsideration in light of Spevack v. Klein, 385 U. S. 511.
Mr. Justice Clark, Mr. Justice Harlan, and Mr. Justice Stewart would affirm the judgment below for the reasons set forth in Mr. Justice Harlan’s dissenting opinion in Spevack v. Klein, 385 U. S., at 520.
Mr. Justice White dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Garrity v. New Jersey, and Spevack v. Klein, 385 U. S., at 530.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Landon Zuckerman and Sam Haber v. Appellate Division, 421 F.2d 625 (2d Cir. 1970)…ranted appellants’ petition for a writ of certiorari, vacated the Appellate Division’s order and remanded the case for “reconsideration in light of Spevack v. Klein, 385 U.S. 511, 87 S.Ct. 625, [17 L.Ed.2d 574] (1967).” Zuckerman, et al. v. Greason, 386 U.S. 15, 87 S.Ct. 847, 17 L.Ed.2d 696 (1967). Without further notice to appellants, the Appellate Division, on March 20, 1967, dismissed one of the charges against Zuckerman on the authority of Spevack v. Klein, supra, and reduced his penalty to a five-ye…
Authorities Cited
- Spevack v. Klein, 385 U.S. 511 (U.S. 1967)