PHILLIPS ET VIR
v.
CALIFORNIA

U.S. | 1967-02-27
No. 684
Mr. Justice Black and'Mr. Justice Clark are of the opinion that the judgment should be vacated and the case remanded for further consideration in light of Chapman v. California, supra., Mr. Justice Harlan would affirm the judgment below for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in Chapman v. California, supra, at 45.
386 U.S. 212 Supreme Court of the United States (1967) Caution
Also reported at: 17 L. Ed. 2d 870 · 87 S. Ct. 977 · 1967 U.S. LEXIS 2146 · SCDB 1966-059
Cited by 12 cases
Topics
Precedent In Forma Pauperis Writ Of Certiorari

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Precedent cases and more on FLexlaw

Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The •judgment is reversed. Chapman v. California, ante, p. 18.

Mr. Justice Black and'Mr. Justice Clark are of the opinion that the judgment should be vacated and the case remanded for further consideration in light of Chapman v. California, supra.

Mr. Justice Harlan would affirm the judgment below for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in Chapman v. California, supra, at 45.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Dep't OF Revenue v. AIR Jamaica Ltd., 455 So. 2d 324 (Fla. 1984)
    …violates the export-import clause. The airlines attempt unsuccessfully to distinguish the case of Shell Oil Company v. State Board of Equalization, 64 Cal.2d 713, 414 P. 2d 820, 51 Cal. Rptr. 524 (1966); appeal dismissed, 386 U.S. 211, 87 S.Ct. 973, 17 L.Ed.2d 870 (1967). Shell indicates, without question, that the fuel at issue here is not an export because it is used to propel that aircraft and is not delivered to another country. Furthermore, the tax in question is imposed on the privilege of the Florida v…
  • Haydee Rodriguez v. Nasrallah, 659 So. 2d 437 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)
    …f sister States. Heritage Corp. of South Florida v. Rivas, 289 So. 2d 432, 434 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); accord Americana of Puerto Rico v. Kaplus, 368 F. 2d 431 (3d Cir.1966), cert. denied sub nom., Kaplus v. Americana of Puerto Rico, Inc., 386 U.S. 943, 87 S.Ct. 977, 17 L.Ed.2d 874 (1967); Rocca v. Royal Bank of Canada, P.R., Inc., 726 F.Supp. 15 (D.P.R. [*440] 1989). A federal statute so provides. 28 U.S.C. § 1738. The summary final judgment nevertheless declined to give full faith and credit to the judgment…
  • Seitlin & Co. v. Dirk R. Doebler, 489 So. 2d 1200 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)
    …ther consistent proceedings. * The term "territory,” as used in acts of Congress, may have different meanings depending upon legislative intent. See Americana of Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Kaplus, 368 F. 2d 431 (3d Cir.1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 943, 87 S.Ct. 977, 17 L.Ed.2d 874 (1967). The same principle applies to the term "possession of the United States.” Vermilya-Brown Co. v. Connell, 335 U.S. 377, 69 S.Ct. 140, 93 L.Ed. 76 (1948). Seitlin relies on Connell which held that the term "possession,” as used…

Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw