CITY OF SARASOTA, ET AL.,
v.
STATE, EX REL. R. W. EVANS
CITY OF SARASOTA, ET AL.,
STATE, EX REL. R. W. EVANS
126 Fla. 407
Florida Supreme Court (1936)
Negative Treatment
Also reported at: 170 So. 927
Cited by 11 cases
Opinion of the Court
The judgment in this case should be affirmed upon the authority of State, ex rel. Gillespie, v. Shelfer, 118 Fla. 14, 160 Sou. Rep. 364; City of Bradenton v. State, ex rel. Perry, 118 Fla. 838, 160 Sou. Rep. 506; City of Bradenton v. State, ex rel. Oliver, 119 Fla. 864, 158 Sou. Rep. 165, and City of Sarasota v. State, ex rel. Evans, 126 Fla. 405, 168 Sou. Rep. 417, and it is so ordered.
Affirmed.
Whitfield, C. J., and Ellis, Terrell, Brown, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (11 total)
-
Greene v. State, 238 So. 2d 296 (Fla. 1970)…ed with a capital offense or an offense punishable by life imprisonment and the proof of guilt is evident or the presumption is great.” Fla.Const. art. I, § 14 (1968 Revision). See Younghans v. State, 90 So. 2d 308 (Fla.1956) and Stalnaker v. State, 126 Fla. 407, 171 So. 226 (1936). . Younghans v. State, 90 So. 2d 308 (Fla.1956). . Floyd v. State, 79 So. 2d 778 (Fla.1955). . See eases listed in Annots., 19 A.L.R. 807 (1922), 77 A.L.R. 1235 (1932), and 45 A.L.R. 458 (1926). . See, e. g., Bowman v. United…
-
Ex parte Hyde, 140 Fla. 494 (Fla. 1939)…viction, but thereafter the allowance of bail is discretionary and allowable only in cases bailable according to the course of the common law or the statutes. Constitution, Declaration of Rights, Section 9; Section 8467 C. G. L., Stalnaker v. State, 126 Fla. 407, 171 So. 226; Ex Parte McDaniel, 86 Fla. 145, 97 So. 317. We have no statute providing for allowance of bail after the judgment of conviction has been affirmed by this Court and petition for rehearing denied. And there was no such right at common l…
-
Rowe v. State, 394 So. 2d 1059 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981)…to review the order. The state argues that under Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.691 (1977) the trial court has no discretion to grant bail to a person convicted of a capital offense. The defendant urges that the rule, interpreted in light of Stalnaker v. State, 126 Fla. 407, 171 So. 226 (1936), Gray v. State, 54 So. 2d 436 (Fla. 1951) and Hedden v. State, 275 So. 2d 52 (Fla.2d DCA 1973), leaves discretion in the trial judge when one charged and convicted of a capital offense is sentenced to life imprisonment. Defendant…
Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- City of Bradenton v. State, 118 Fla. 838 (Fla. 1935)
- Norwich Union Indem. Co. v. Millard F. Willis (Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 124 Fla. 137 (Fla. 1936)
- City of Bradenton v. State, 117 Fla. 578 (Fla. 1934)
- State v. Shelfer, 118 Fla. 14 (Fla. 1934)
- McCartia v. State, 118 Fla. 810 (Fla. 1935)
- City of Sarasota v. State, 126 Fla. 405 (Fla. 1936)