HALL ET UX.

v.

BLEISCH ET UX.

Citator

Cited By

• Buttler v. State, 238 So. 2d 313 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970)
  …se of furnishing a defendant with information that will enable him to better prepare his defense; it eliminates surprise and affords a defendant time to interview witnesses. Compare People v. Raby, 40 Ill.2d 392, 240 N.E. 2d 595 (1968), cert. denied 393 U.S. 1083, 89 S.Ct. 867, 21 L.Ed.2d 776; State v. Shelby, 1966, 69 Wash.2d 295, 418 P. 2d 246. An error in procedure under Rule 1.220(e) does not entitle a defendant to a reversal for new trial [*315] where it can be affirmatively determined that no prejudice…
• Greenstein v. Seaboard Coast Line R.R. Co., 471 So. 2d 1318 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
  …itly approved such words or comparable words in a F.E.L.A. claim jury instruction. Farnarjian v. American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc., 474 F. 2d 361 (2d Cir.1973); Funseth v. Great Northern Railway Co., 399 F. 2d 918 (9th Cir.1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1083, 89 S.Ct. 865, 21 L.Ed.2d 775 (1969); Tyree v. New York Central Railroad Co., 382 F. 2d 524 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1014, 88 S.Ct. 589, 19 L.Ed.2d 659 (1967); Iannacito v. Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad, 380 F. 2d 1019 (10th Cir. 19…
• Holland v. Seaboard Coast Line R.R. Co., 353 So. 2d 618 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977)
  …l,” and yet be actionable. Other portions of the trial court’s jury charge made that point clearly. I do not conceive that the charge was error, harmless or otherwise. See Funseth v. Great Northern Ry. Co., 399 F. 2d 918 (9th Cir. 1968), cert. den., 393 U.S. 1083, 89 S.Ct. 865, 21 L.Ed.2d 755; Spinks v. Chevron Oil Co., 507 F. 2d 216 (5th Cir. 1975) (discussing identical causative requirements under the Jones Act); 3 Devitt & Blackmar, Federal Jury Practice and Instructions § 94.13 (3d ed. 1977). The charge…