JANE YOUNG, AND OTHERS, LEGATEES OF JOHN PARKS, DECEASED, APPELLANTS,
v.
EDWARD L. SMITH, AND HENRY N. ALLEN, EXECUTORS OF THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF JOHN PARKS, DECEASED

U.S. | 1841-01-01
15 Pet. 287 Supreme Court of the United States (1841) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 10 L. Ed. 741 · 1841 U.S. LEXIS 271 · SCDB 1841-022
Cited by 4 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

In this equity suit by legatees against executors of an estate seeking recovery of their shares and an accounting, the Supreme Court held that the Circuit Court's decree was interlocutory rather than final because it did not dispose of the entire controversy—it awarded a portion of the estate while leaving uncollected debts to be distributed in future proceedings. The Court dismissed the appeal, establishing that under federal law, appeals lie only from decrees that finally resolve all matters in controversy, not from partial judgments that may generate successive appeals on different phases of the same suit.


© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court
Mr. Justice Story

Mr. Justice Story delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is an appeal from the decree of the Circuit Court of the Southern District of Alabama, in a suit in equity; and the only question now submitted for our consideration is whether the decree in the case is a final decree, in the sense of the acts of Congress of the 24th of September, 1789, ch. 20, sec. 22; and the act of 3d of March, 1803, ch. 93; from which an appeal lies to this-Court.

The original bill was brought by the plaintiffs, (now appellants ,) against the appellees, as executors of John Parks, to recover their respective proportions as residuary legatees-of the personal estate of the testator-under h.is will, and for an account and. due .administration of the assets. ' Upon the coming in of the answer, it was referred to a master to take an account; the master-afterwards made a report, to which exceptions were filed; and it was thereupon ordered by the Court that'the sum of seven thousand seven hundred and ninety-five dollars and twenty-seven cents, admitteck-to be in ithe hands of the executors, be paid into Court, subject to the order of the Court, which was accordingly-paid;, and the report was, thereupon, referred back-to the master: and after' several intermediate proceedings and reports^ the master ma.de his final report on the 2d of March, 1840, by which he found ;a .balance then in the hands of the executors, of eleven thousand three-hundred.and fifty-five dollars and twenty-three cents, inclusive of the said sum of seven thousand' seven hundred and ninety-five dollars and twenty-seven cents, and exclusive of sundry uncollected debts, then outstanding, some of which were good, some doubtful, and some bad. To this report the plaintiffs filed certain exceptions, on the '27th of the same month; which exceptions were disallowed, by the Court as not having been taken before the master, or filed in the .proper time. And thereupon. the Court proceeded. to decree that' the réport be accepted, that the plaintiffs should have execution for'the said sum of eleven thousand three hundred and fifty-five dollars and twenty-three cents; and “ that as to the residue of the debts due to the estate of John Parks, deceased, and not collected, it is ordered and adjudged by the Court, that. as soon as the said executors shall succeed in the collection of the same, or any part thereof, that they do pay the amount' into Court for distribution,, to be made under the direction of this Court.” - The plaintiffs having received the said sum. of seven thousand seven hundred and ninety-five dollars and twenty-seven cents, acknowledged the recéipt thereof; which was to be credited on the decree , as a payment made on the lSth of .November, 1838 : to'the above decree the appeal is taken.

We are of opinion that the decree .is an interlocutory and not a final decree, in the sense of the act of Congress. It is plain that it does not dispose of the whole matter in controversy be tween the parties. And if an appeal could now lie upon the decree already rendered, an appeal could also lie from time to time, from any future decree of distribution of any assets which may be collected after the former decree, toties quoties; without any final decision being made of all the matters in controversy. •In our judgment this would be against the clear import and in: tention of the acts of Congress; which were designed to'give an appeal only from a decree final, upon the whole matters and merits of the controversy.

The consequence is, that the appeal must be dismissed with costs.

This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record from the Circuit Court of the United States' for the Southern District of Alabama, and was argued by counsel. On consideration whereof, it is the opinion of this Court that the decree in this case is an interlocutory and not p final decree in the sense of the act of; Congress; whereupon, it is now here ordered and decreed, that this appeal be, and the same is hereby, dismissed with costs, and that this cause be, and the same is. hereby, remanded to the said Circuit Court to be proceeded in according to law and justice.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Griffin v. Orman, 9 Fla. 22 (Fla. 1860)
  • Bellamy v. Bellamy, 4 Fla. 242 (Fla. 1851)
  • Lodge v. Twell, 135 U.S. 232 (U.S. 1890)
    …t was left to be done was something more than the mere ministerial execution of the decree as rendered. The decree was interlocutory, and not final, even though it settled .the equities of the bill. Craighead, v. Wilson, 18 How. 199; Young v. Smith, 15 Pet. 287; Keystone Iron Co. v. Martin, 132 U. S. 91. In Railroad Co. v. Swasey, 23 Wall. 405, 409, Mr. Chief Justice Chase, in passing upon a decree 'of foreclosure and sale, observed that an appeal may be taken from such a decree “when the rights óf the pa…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw