STATE

v.

CARL L. STANLEY

Citator

Cited By

• Hartleb v. State, 677 So. 2d 336 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)
  …Transp., 636 So. 2d 131 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). Subsequently, an apportionment hearing is conducted to determine the respective rights of the respondents in the award. Bolduc; State Road Dept. v. Thibaut, 190 So. 2d 53 (Fla. 4th DCA 1966), cert. denied, 196 So. 2d 922 (1967); Lee County v. Sager, 595 So. 2d 177 (Fla. 2d DCA), rev. denied, 606 So. 2d 1165 (Fla.1992); Division of Admin., State of Fla. v. Allen, 447 So. 2d 1383 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984). Here, there being no indication in the offer that Appellant’s recove…
• Rally's Hamburgers, Inc. v. State, 697 So. 2d 535 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)
  …nc., 510 So. 2d 603, 604-05 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 518 So. 2d 1278 (Fla.1987); State Road Dep’t of Florida v. Myers, 211 So. 2d 33 (Fla. 1st DCA 1968); State Road Dep't of Florida v. Thibaut, 190 So. 2d 53, 55 (Fla. 4th DCA 1966), cert. denied, 196 So. 2d 922 (Fla.1967).…
• Lambert v. State, 560 So. 2d 346 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990)
  …fter the passage of time), he did not sit in on the opening statements. It is within the discretion of the trial judge to invoke the rule of sequestration after opening statements. See Sise v. State, 188 So. 2d 396 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966) cert. denied, 196 So. 2d 922 (Fla.1967). In any event no prejudice resulted in this case since the evidence clearly shows that Officer Baker was aware of the potential intoxication defense before opening statements. AFFIRMED. DANIEL, C.J., and W. SHARP, J., concur.…

Authorities Cited

• Stanley v. State, 189 So. 2d 898 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966)