AINSLEY REALTY CO., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
RICHARD I. KRAMER, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1967-05-09
No. 65-329
Before HENDRY, C. J., and PEARSON and BARKDULL, JJ.
198 So. 2d 640 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1967) Positive Treatment
Cited by 11 cases
Topics
Substantial Evidence Standard

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Substantial Evidence Standard cases and more on FLexlaw

Opinion of the Court
"PER CURIAM.

"PER CURIAM.

Defendant Ainsley Realty Company appeals from a final judgment, in a non-jury trial, in favor of the plaintiff, Richard I. Kramer.

The court’s findings are entitled to the weight of a jury verdict and will not be disturbed unless it is shown that there is a total lack of substantial evidence to support his conclusions. Chakford v. Strum, Fla. 1956, 87 So.2d 419.

We hold that the record reveals adequate support for the findings and conclusions of the trial judge. Finding no error the judgment appealed is affirmed.

A.ffirmed.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Se. Foods, Inc. v. Penguin Frozen Foods, 203 So. 2d 39 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967)
    …indings are entitled to the same weight given a jury verdict. Such findings are not to be disturbed unless the record is devoid of competent supporting evidence. Chakford v. Strum, Fla.1956, 87 So. 2d 419; Ainsley Realty Co. v. Kramer, Fla.App.1967, 198 So. 2d 640. On a thorough examination of the record here before is, we find substantial competent evidence to sustain each and every of the findings set out above. According to the trial court’s findings, the warehouse receipt covering the shrimp which were t…
  • The Prudential Ins. Co. OF Am. v. Latham, 207 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968)
    …Beach v. Young, Fla.App.1962, 142 So. 2d 788. The finding is entitled to the weight of a jury verdict. It will not be disturbed where supported by substantial competent evidence, Stanley v. Stanley, supra; Ainsley Realty Co. v. Kramer, Fla.App.1967, 198 So. 2d 640; Alvarez v. Dumont, Fla.App.1965, 178 So. 2d 352. The record on appeal contains such evidence as will support the finding in this case. And we are in accord with the chancellor’s ruling that delivery of the policy to the agent constitutes delivery t…
  • 2765 S. Bayshore Drive Corp. v. Fred Howland, Inc., 212 So. 2d 911 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968)
    …erial fact, and ap-pellees were entitled to summary judgment in their favor as a matter of law as to Count I. See Visingardi v. Tirone, Fla. 1967, 193 So. 2d 601; Holl v. Talcott, Fla. 1966, 191 So. 2d 40; Ainsley Realty Co. v. Kramer, Fla.App.1967, 198 So. 2d 640. Count II of appellant’s complaint alleges that the defect in the construction of the chimney and flue constitutes a breach of the construction contract, entitling appellant to recovery for the consequent damage to the structure and its contents. A…

Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw