JOHN T. REYNOLDS, PETITIONER, CROSS-RESPONDENT,
v.
FLORIDA MOBILE HOMES, INC., ET AL., RESPONDENTS, CROSS-PETITIONERS

Fla. | 1967-07-07
No. 35490
O’CONNELL, C. J., and DREW, THORNAL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
200 So. 2d 793 Florida Supreme Court (1967) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Florida Supreme Court denied a petition and cross-petition for a writ of certiorari, finding no deviation from the essential requirements of law in the Florida Industrial Commission's amended order. The court dispensed with oral argument and allowed fees for the claimant's attorneys.


Holding

No, the Florida Industrial Commission's amended order did not deviate from the essential requirements of law.


Key Quotes

“Our consideration of said petitions, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.”

This quote establishes the court's conclusion after reviewing the case materials.

Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

The case came before the Florida Supreme Court on an amended petition and cross-petition for a writ of certiorari, seeking review of an amended order …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

By amended petition and cross-petition for writ of certiorari, addressed to an amended order of the Florida Industrial Commission entered in this cause pursuant to mandate of this Court on rehearing, we have for review said order bearing date March 22, 1967.

We find that oral argument on said amended and cross-petition would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of said petitions, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petitions are therefore denied.

Claimant’s attorneys are allowed $250.00 for all services in this Court.

It is so ordered.

O’CONNELL, C. J., and DREW, THORNAL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …onsideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied. Cf. Reynolds v. Fla. Mobile Homes, opinion filed July 7, 1967, Fla., 200 So. 2d 793. The attorney for the respondent William F. Wilson is hereby awarded a fee in the amount of $250.00 for services in this Court. It is so ordered. CALDWELL, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw