JOHN T. REYNOLDS, PETITIONER, CROSS-RESPONDENT,
v.
FLORIDA MOBILE HOMES, INC., ET AL., RESPONDENTS, CROSS-PETITIONERS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court denied a petition and cross-petition for a writ of certiorari, finding no deviation from the essential requirements of law in the Florida Industrial Commission's amended order. The court dispensed with oral argument and allowed fees for the claimant's attorneys.
No, the Florida Industrial Commission's amended order did not deviate from the essential requirements of law.
“Our consideration of said petitions, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.”
This quote establishes the court's conclusion after reviewing the case materials.
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe case came before the Florida Supreme Court on an amended petition and cross-petition for a writ of certiorari, seeking review of an amended order …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
By amended petition and cross-petition for writ of certiorari, addressed to an amended order of the Florida Industrial Commission entered in this cause pursuant to mandate of this Court on rehearing, we have for review said order bearing date March 22, 1967.
We find that oral argument on said amended and cross-petition would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of said petitions, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petitions are therefore denied.
Claimant’s attorneys are allowed $250.00 for all services in this Court.
It is so ordered.
O’CONNELL, C. J., and DREW, THORNAL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Lake Region Packing Ass'n & Hardware Mut. Ins. Co. v. Wilson, 202 So. 2d 755 (Fla. 1967)…onsideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied. Cf. Reynolds v. Fla. Mobile Homes, opinion filed July 7, 1967, Fla., 200 So. 2d 793. The attorney for the respondent William F. Wilson is hereby awarded a fee in the amount of $250.00 for services in this Court. It is so ordered. CALDWELL, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Reynolds v. Fla. Mobile Homes, Inc., 195 So. 2d 561 (Fla. 1966)