LAKE REGION PACKING ASSOCIATION AND HARDWARE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, PETITIONERS,
v.
WILLIAM F. WILSON AND FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Essential Requirements Of Law cases and more on FLexlaw
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date April 20, 1967.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is therefore denied. Cf. Reynolds v. Fla. Mobile Homes, opinion filed July 7, 1967, Fla., 200 So.2d 793.
The attorney for the respondent William F. Wilson is hereby awarded a fee in the amount of $250.00 for services in this Court.
It is so ordered.
CALDWELL, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
In re Standard Jury Instructions IN Civil Cases-Report NO. 09-01 (Reorganization of the Civil Jury Instructions). In re Standard Jury Instructions in Civil Cases-Report No. 09-02 (Greater Weight of the Evidence, 35 So. 3d 666 (Fla. 2010)…d occurring while he or she is engaged in an activity normally undertaken principally by adults and for which adult qualifications are usually required, such as operating an automobile, airplane, motorboat, or motorcycle, e.g., Medina v. McAllister, 202 So. 2d 755 (Fla.1967). 401.6 NEGLIGENCE OF A COMMON CARRIER Negligence is the failure to use reasonable care. (Defendant) is a common carrier. [The reasonable care required of (defendant) is different from the reasonable care required of a passenger.] The r…
-
Lopez v. Midwest Mut. Ins. Co., 223 So. 2d 550 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969)…t coverage was and no one explained it to him. We must reject this argument, too, because Manuel Lopez although a minor was undertaking the sort of adult activity which requires him to be held to adult standards. Cf. Medina v. McAllister, Fla. 1967, 202 So. 2d 755. This is especially true in view of § 627.01051, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., above mentioned. The insurance company has no duty to, explain uninsured motorist coverage to an insurance applicant unless the applicant asks for an explanation. We think the cont…
-
Swindell v. Hellkamp, 232 So. 2d 186 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970)…charged the jury that a minor is held to an adult standard in operating an automobile this would have been nothing but surplusage even though the underlying proposition of law is correct as an abstract principle. See Medina v. McAllister, Fla.1967, 202 So. 2d 755. The judgment appealed from is affirmed. WALDEN, J., concurs. CROSS, C. J., dissents, with opinion.…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Reynolds v. Fla. Mobile Homes, Inc., 200 So. 2d 793 (Fla. 1967)
- City OF Boca Raton v. State of Fla. & Byrd Marshall, 200 So. 2d 793 (Fla. 1967)