IN RE ESTATE OF ROSELLA M. SAGER, DECEASED. IN RE ESTATE OF DWIGHT E. SAGER, DECEASED
This is an appeal by the residual beneficiaries, Dwight Sager, Jr., as guardian of Steven D. Sager and Stuart E. Sager, minors, and Dwight Sager, Jr., individually, from final orders of the county judge’s court awarding attorney’s fees and executrix’s fees in the Estates of Rosella M. Sager and Dwight E. Sager.
The primary thrust of this appeal is that the fees awarded were excessive.
This court has carefully reviewed this cause and all assignments of error and finds there is competent substantial evidence to support the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the trial judge..
The judgment is therefore affirmed.
Affirmed.
WALDEN, C. J., concurs.
MACMILLAN, HUGH, Associate Judge, dissents.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (13 total)
-
State v. Bell, 249 So. 2d 748 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971)…articular facts presented to the trial court. The factual determination of the trial court should not be reversed on appeal in the absence of clearly demonstrated error. Gagnon v. State, Fla.App. 1968, 212 So. 2d 337; Echols v. State, Fla. App.1967, 201 So. 2d 89. In testing the accuracy of a trial court’s conclusions on a motion to suppress evidence, the appellate court should interpret the evidence and all reasonable inferences and deductions therefrom in the light most favorable to sustain those conclusio…
-
Dooley v. State, 501 So. 2d 18 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986)…clusive province of the trial judge. See City of Tallahassee v. Florida Public Service Commission, 433 So. 2d 505 (Fla.1983); State v. Garcia, 431 So. 2d 651 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); State v. Melendez, 392 So. 2d 587 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); Echols v. State, 201 So. 2d 89 (Fla. 2d DCA 1967). Pursuant to an appeal of the suppression order, the circuit court, en banc, issued an opinion dated March 5, 1985, wherein it recited, as established fact, the testimony [*19] of the police officer relating to the defendant’s p…
-
Holley Curtis Taylor v. State, 289 So. 2d 421 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)…and seizure. The trial court correctly denied the motion, on the ground that the defendant was in a status of extended custody in which the official of the prison camp was entitled to search him without a warrant. Cf. Echols v. State, Fla.App. 1967, 201 So. 2d 89, 93-94; Lavazzoli v. State, Fla.App. 1973, 281 So. 2d 519. At the trial the prison captain testified to the above facts, as the basis for the search, namely that the defendant was an inmate of the prison camp on extended custody under a work releas…
Previewing 3 of 13 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence