INTERCOASTAL DRYDOCK, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE ROAD DEPARTMENT, AN AGENCY OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
This case concerns whether a lessee is entitled to business damages in an eminent domain proceeding when the entirety of their leased premises is taken. The court held that business damages are only recoverable if the business is located on adjoining lands, not the taken premises.
No, a lessee is not entitled to business damages under these circumstances. Business damages are only recoverable for a business located on adjoining lands, not the land taken by eminent domain.
“Under the applicable law (§ 73.071(3) (b) Fla.Stat., F.S.A.) business damages are recoverable by an owner (or a lessee) only for a business (of more than five years' standing) "located upon adjoining lands owned or held by such party."”
This quote explains the statutory basis for denying business damages to the lessee.
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceIntercoastal Drydock, Inc. (appellant) leased land from 1961 for ten years and operated a business. The State Road Department initiated an eminent dom…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Business Damages In Eminent Domain cases and more on FLexlaw
The appellant, one of the defendants in a case of eminent domain, held a lease on a parcel of land owned by the defendant Elmore Daniels. The lease was made in 1961 and was for a period of ten years. The appellant had operated a business thereon from inception of the lease.
On trial the jury made an award of $197,705 for the property taken, plus moving expense of $3,602.50 to the owner, and found no special or “business damages” for the lessee. On this appeal, the lessee, contending it was entitled to receive damages to its business, assigned as error certain rulings on evidence relating to its income or profit from its business. Those assignments and the arguments presented thereon are without merit. This is so because, as averred in the appellant’s answer and stated in appellant’s brief, all of the leased premises on which its business was located were taken on condemnation. Under the applicable law (§ 73.071(3) (b) Fla.Stat., F.S.A.) business damages are recoverable by an owner (or a lessee) only for a business (of more than five years’ standing) “located upon adjoining lands owned or held by such party.” See State Road Department v. Bramlett, Fla.1966, 189 So.2d 481, 483; Guarria v. State Road Department of Florida, Fla.App.1960, 117 So.2d 5, 6. In such circumstance the lessee is relegated to receiving from the jury’s award the value of his leasehold interest to be determined and apportioned by the trial judge, as provided for in § 73.101 Fla.Stat., F.S.A. See Carter v. State Road Department, Fla.1966, 189 So.2d 793.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- In re THE Florida BAR, 189 So. 2d 481 (Fla. 1966)
- Carter v. State Rd. Dep't, 189 So. 2d 793 (Fla. 1966)
- Guarria v. Duke, Jr., 117 So. 2d 5 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960)