HOUSE

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (95 total)

• Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Bennett, 883 So. 2d 373 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)
  …educe to a neat general formula the relationship between preparation of a document and possible litigation necessary to trigger the protection of the work product doctrine. See Kent Corp. v. NLRB, 5 Cir. 1976, 530 F. 2d 612, 623, cert. denied, 1976, 429 U.S. 920, 97 S.Ct. 316, 50 L.Ed.2d 287; In re Grand Jury Investigation (United States), 3 Cir.1979, 599 F. 2d 1224, 1229. We conclude that litigation need not necessarily be imminent, as some courts have suggested, see, e.g., Home Insurance Co. v. Ballenger…
• Am. Tobacco Co. v. Patterson, 456 U.S. 63 (U.S. 1982)
  …use of the six lines of progression. The Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed and remanded for further proceedings with respect to remedy, Patterson v. American Tobacco Co., 535 F. 2d 257 (1976), and we denied a petition for certiorari. 429 U. S. 920 (1976). On remand petitioners moved to vacate the District Court’s 1974 orders and to dismiss the complaints on the basis of this Court’s decision in Teamsters v. United States, 431 U. S. 324 (1977), which held that § 703(h) insulates bona fide sen…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• James v. Stockham Valves & Fittings Co., 559 F.2d 310 (5th Cir. 1977)
  …to terminate on the date a victim of discrimination attains an opportunity to move to his “rightful place” rather than on the date the order granting relief is entered. See Patterson v. American Tobacco Co., 4 Cir. 1976, 535 F. 2d 257, cert. denied, 429 U.S. 920, 97 S.Ct. 314, 50 L.Ed.2d 286; E. E. O. C. v. Enterprise Ass’n Steamfitters, Local No. 638, 2 Cir. 1976, 542 F. 2d 579, app. pending. The First Circuit stated in E. E. O. C. v. Enterprise Ass’n Steamfitters, 542 F. 2d at 590-91: It is the date of a…