EDITH M. BOWEN, APPELLANT,
v.
GLENN D. EVERETT, EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF LILLIAN G. EVERETT, DECEASED, AND PAUL W. EVERETT, DALE D. EVERETT AND KAREN J. EVERETT, INFANTS, BY GLENN D. EVERETT, THEIR GUARDIAN, AND ALMA WOLF, APPELLEES

Fla. 2d DCA | 1967-12-29
No. 67-248
LILES, C. J., and ALLEN and HOB-SON, JJ., concur.
205 So. 2d 536 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1967) Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

This case involves an appeal from a judgment entered by a trial court, sitting without a jury, in favor of the appellees. The appellate court affirmed the judgment, holding that the trial judge's findings of fact and application of law were not clearly erroneous.


Holding

No, the trial judge's findings of fact and application of law were not clearly erroneous. The appellate court found no reason to question the trial judge's conclusions.


Key Quotes

“Where a case is tried before a trial judge without the intervention of a jury, the conclusion he reaches has the weight of a jury verdict.”

Establishes the standard of review for a bench trial, giving the trial judge's conclusions the weight of a jury verdict.

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

The appellant appealed a judgment entered by a trial court that was not sitting with a jury. The trial court ruled in favor of the appellees. The appe…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant-appellant has appealed from a judgment entered by the trial court, sitting without jury, in favor of plaintiff-appellees.

It must be remembered that:

“Where a case is tried before a trial judge without the intervention of a jury, the conclusion he reaches has the weight of a jury verdict. The conclusions of the *537trial judge as to matters of fact come before the appellate court clothed with the presumption of correctness, and in testing the accuracy of such conclusions the appellate court should interpret the evidence and all reasonable inferences and deductions capable of being drawn theiefrom in the light most favorable to sustain those conclusions. Ordinarily, the appellate court will refuse to consider a finding of fact made by a trial judge unless it is clearly erroneously (sic) * 2 Fla.Jur., Appeals § 346.

The appellant has shown nothing that would lead us to question either the trial judge’s findings of fact or his application of law; therefore, the judgment is affirmed.

LILES, C. J., and ALLEN and HOB-SON, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Dixson v. Kattel, 311 So. 2d 827 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975)
    …of an exchange of properties between the Dixons and one Dorsey; this transaction actually closed. My view of the record supports the broker’s entitlement to a commission and I would affirm the judgment under review. Bowen v. Everett, Fla.App. 1967, 205 So. 2d 536; Vero Fruit Company v. Owens, Fla.App.1968, 208 So. 2d 627.…
  • Mesick v. Loeser, 311 So. 2d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975)
    …n the evidence but rather must indulge every fact and inference in support of that judgment which was the equivalent of a jury verdict. Reserve Insurance Co. v. Earle W. Day & Co., Fla.App.2d 1968, 209 So. 2d 709; Bowen v. Everett, Fla. App.2d 1967, 205 So. 2d 536. We dispose of appellant’s claim for attorneys’ fees for bringing funds into the decedent’s estate by recognizing that any attorney who renders legal service to an estate may apply to the probate court by appropriate petition and notice for a deter…
  • Richardson v. Fast, 208 So. 2d 832 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968)
    …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Bowen v. Everett, Fla.App.1967, 205 So. 2d 536; Gleim v. Gleim, Fla.App.1965, 176 So. 2d 610 and Lyden v. DePiera, Fla.App.1963, 147 So. 2d 573.…

Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw