STEVEN RICHARD DIEHL, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Voyle C. Johnson v. Kruglak, 246 So. 2d 617 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971)
  …nsidered by the trial court, but the determination must be supported by substantial, competent evidence. Novack v. Novack, Fla.App.1966, 189 So. 2d 513 and Adler v. Schekter, Fla.App.1967, 197 So. 2d 46, same fee affirmed after remand, Fla.App.1968, 207 So. 2d 78. The trial judge made a series of detailed findings of fact underlying his consideration of the factors in the cases cited above. The findings of the trial court are clothed with a presumption of correctness. These findings were to the effect that…
• Madaline Lodding and Woodrow C. Lodding v. Dunn, 251 So. 2d 560 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971)
  …tor be considered by the trial court, but the determination must be supported by substantial, competent evidence. Novack v. Novack, Fla.App.1966, 189 So. 2d 513 and Adler v. Schekter, Fla.App.1967, 197 So. 2d 46, same fee after remand, Fla.App.1968, 207 So. 2d 78. The trial judge here made a series of findings of fact underlying his consideration of the factors discussed in the cases cited. These findings of the trial court are clothed with a presumption of correctness. In the instant case these findings w…
• Zorovich v. Stoller, 293 So. 2d 788 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)
  …. Johnson v. Kruglak, 246 So. 2d 617, 620, (Fla.App.1971); Lodding v. Dunn, 251 So. 2d 560, 561 (Fla.App.1971); Novack v. Novack, 189 So. 2d 513, 514 (Fla.App.1966); Adler v. Schekter, 197 So. 2d 46, 49 (Fla. [*791] App.1967), same fee after remand, 207 So. 2d 78 (Fla.App.1968). This is a case in which it is appropriate to repeat the admonitions of our Supreme Court in Provus v. Provus, 44 So. 2d 656, 657 (Fla.1950), as we did in the Novack case, supra, as follows: “Fixing the amount of counsel fees, as a…