RICKEY WRIGHT, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
RICKEY WRIGHT, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
207 So. 2d 519
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1968)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
The appellant was convicted after a non-jury trial of robbery and sentenced to ten years in the State prison. On this appeal the point presented urges that the appellant was denied a fair trial because he was entitled to inspection at trial of a prosecution witness’ statement for the purpose of cross examination. The statement was not introduced into evidence or used by the witness in testifying. This point has been decided adversely to the appellant. See McAden v. State, 155 Fla. 523, 21 So.2d 33 (1945); Jackman v. State, Fla.App.1962, 140 So.2d 627; State v. McCall, Fla.App.1966, 186 So.2d 324.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Anderson v. State, 207 So. 2d 520 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed on authority of the opinion of this court filed on this date in the case of Wright v. State, Fla.App.1968, 207 So. 2d 519.…
-
Mason Braswell v. State, 230 So. 2d 192 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970)…Mathis v. State, 70 Fla. 194, 69 So. 697; Morasso v. State, 74 Fla. 269, 76 So. 777; Cornelius v. State, Fla.1950, 49 So. 2d 332; Nelson v. State, Fla.1957, 97 So. 2d 250; Evans v. State, Fla.App.1965, 178 So. 2d 892; Wright v. State, Fla.App.1968, 207 So. 2d 519; Dames v. State, Fla.App.1969, 222 So. 2d 52.…
Authorities Cited
- Jackman v. State, 140 So. 2d 627 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962)
- McAden v. State, 155 Fla. 523 (Fla. 1945)
- State v. McCALL, 186 So. 2d 324 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966)