HERMINIA JIMENEZ, AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF FELIX A. JIMENEZ, DECEASED, AND HERMINIA JIMENEZ, AS AN INDIVIDUAL, APPELLANT,
v.
LARY FRED VON ZAMFT AND COIN METER COMPANY, APPELLEES
HERMINIA JIMENEZ, AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF FELIX A. JIMENEZ, DECEASED, AND HERMINIA JIMENEZ, AS AN INDIVIDUAL, APPELLANT,
LARY FRED VON ZAMFT AND COIN METER COMPANY, APPELLEES
210 So. 2d 28
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1968)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed on the authority of Griffis v. DuBow, Fla.App.1959, 114 So.2d 207; Bailey v. Keene, Fla.App.1960, 122 So.2d 498; Jackson v. Haney, Fla.App.1960, 124 So.2d 719; Applegate v. Holland, Fla.App.1965, 177 So.2d 46.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State of Fla. Dep't OF Transp. v. Stubbs, 285 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1973)…to compensation for this damage.” Id. at 797, 798. Cf. Boney v. State, Department of Transportation, 250 So. 2d 650 (Fla.App.1971); State Road Department of Florida v. McCaffrey, 229 So. 2d 668 (Fla.App.1969); and Benerofe v. State Road Department, 210 So. 2d 28 (Fla.App.1968), 217 So. 2d 838 (Fla.1969). Petitioner has argued orally and in briefs that the case presently under review is distinguishable from the Anhoco holding in that the Respondents still have access to Firestone Road by use of the overpass…
-
Stubbs v. State of Fla. Dep't OF Transp., 265 So. 2d 425 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972)…ning lands and, in effect, are placed in a cul-de-sac. We do not agree. This court in Boney v. State Department of Transportation, 250 So. 2d 650, citing Anhoco Corp. v. Dade County, 144 So. 2d 793 (Fla.1962), and Benerofe v. State Road Department, 210 So. 2d 28 (Fla.App.1968), held that the taking had deprived appellants of a right to use one direction of an unopen, undedicated street bordering their property, and some right of access had been destroyed for which compensation was due. In due deference to t…
-
Boney v. State, 250 So. 2d 650 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971)…an unopen, undedicated street bordering their property, nevertheless, some right of access, albeit previously unused, has been destroyed. We feel the facts below require application of the rule of law recognized in Benerofe v. State Road Department, 210 So. 2d 28, 30 (Fla.App.1968): “ * * * [WJhere a limited access is taken, the abutting property owners are entitled to compensation for the destruction of their previously-existing right of access. Anhoco Corporation v. Dade County, 144 So. 2d 793, (Fla.1962)…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Griffis v. DU BOW, 114 So. 2d 207 (Fla. 1st DCA 1959)
- Jackson v. Haney, 124 So. 2d 719 (Fla. 2d DCA 1960)
- Kathie Ann Bailey v. Keene, 122 So. 2d 498 (Fla. 2d DCA 1960)
- Applegate v. Jefferson Wesley Holland, 177 So. 2d 46 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965)