SAMUEL EDWARD RUSHING, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
SAMUEL EDWARD RUSHING, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
210 So. 2d 458
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1968)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed. See: Perry v. State, Fla.App.1965, 177 So.2d 892; Woods v. State, 152 Fla. 417, 12 So.2d 111.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Socarras v. Claughton Hotels, Inc., 374 So. 2d 1057 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)…eable land sales contract, the statute of frauds2 requires the contract to satisfy two threshold conditions. First, the contract must be embodied in a written memorandum signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought. Sill v. Ocala Jewelers, 210 So. 2d 458 (Fla. 1st DCA 1968). Second, the written memorandum must disclose all of the essential terms of the sale and these terms may not be explained by resort to parol evidence. Rundel v. Gordon, 92 Fla. 110, 111 So. 386 (1927); Cohodas v. Russell, 289 So.…
Authorities Cited
- Glenwood Frederick Perry v. State, 177 So. 2d 892 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965)
- Harley Woods v. State, 152 Fla. 417 (Fla. 1943)