GLADYS MCCAULEY, APPELLANT,
v.
EASTERN STEAMSHIP LINES, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION ET AL., APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Plaintiff McAuley, a cruise ship passenger injured when a deck chair collapsed, appealed summary judgment in favor of Eastern Steamship Lines. The court reversed, finding that evidence in the record created a genuine issue of material fact regarding whether the defendant operated or controlled the vessel, making summary judgment improper.
Summary judgment was improper. Although ownership was clearly in Ariadne Shipping Co., Ltd., the facts established in the deposition—including the defendant's scheduling of cruises, control of personnel hiring, and retention of all ticket sale proceeds—could justify an inference that the defendant operated, maintained, and controlled the vessel to some extent, creating a question of fact for trial rather than summary disposition.
“The record upon which the moving party relied does not meet the Holl standard and we therefore hold that the entry of such summary final judgment was error.”
Establishes the core holding that the summary judgment was improper under the applicable legal standard.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceMcAuley was a paying passenger on the vessel S.S. Ariadne when a defective deck chair collapsed, injuring her. Eastern Steamship Lines, Inc. did not o…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Summary Judgment Standard cases and more on FLexlaw
Plaintiff appeals from summary final judgment entered in favor of defendant, Eastern Steamship Lines, Inc. The record upon which the moving party relied does not meet the Holl1 standard and we therefore hold that the entry of such summary final judgment was error.
Plaintiff’s amended complaint alleges in substance that she was a paying passenger on the vessel S. S. Ariadne and when she attempted to sit in a deck chair furnished to her, the same collapsed because of its defective condition, thereby causing her personal injuries; that the defendant Eastern Steamship Lines, Inc. and the defendant Ariadne Shipping Co., Ltd., jointly or severally owned, operated, maintained and controlled the vessels which was operated by the defendants, either jointly or severally, as a cruise ship catering to passengers for Caribbean and Bahamian cruises; Count I of the amended complaint alleged that defendants were negligent in maintaining this part of the ship’s equipment, and Count II alleged that the defendants breached their contract with plaintiff to. transport her in a safe and competent manner and to provide her with safe facilities. Apparently service was not made on the defendant, Ariadne Shipping Co., Ltd., but appellee, Eastern Steamship Lines, Inc. filed responsive pleadings consisting of an answer denying the allegations of Count I as pertaining toi it, and certain motions addressed to the remaining counts of the amended complaint. The only evidence before the court on appellee’s motion for summary judgment was the affidavit of one T. F. Kane, vice president of appellee corporation, and his deposition taken subsequently by the plaintiff.
From the deposition it is clear that appellee did not own the vessel and ap-pellee’s vice president stated that appellee neither operated nor controlled the vessel. However, the deposition established that the appellee scheduled the cruises, selected the ports of call of the cruises and the dates and times of arrival and departure, established the prices to be charged for such cruises, and handled all advertsing and dealing with travel agents and bureaus for the sale of tickets, reservations, and distribution of literature and brochures for said cruises; furthermore, appellee pro*74cured and hired all personnel to be used aboard the ship, and appellee retained under its control all funds received from the sale of tickets for the account of the owner, from which funds appellee paid all ship personnel, and paid all bills for food, fuel, repairs, dockage and any other expenses for operation of the ship. While ownership clearly was shown to be in Ariadne Shipping Co., Ltd., the foregoing facts would justify an inference that appellee to some extent did operate, maintain and control the ship, an inference which might result in the appellee incurring liability.
The probative weight or sufficiency of this inference is an issue to be resolved at trial. The purpose of a summary judgment proceeding is to determine the existence or absence of material issues of fact and is not designed as a trial by affidavit2 or deposition.
Reversed.
WALDEN, C. J., and DOWNEY, JAMES C., Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Egan v. Wash. Gen. Ins. Corp., 240 So. 2d 875 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970)…function of the trial court to [*877] decide the disputed issues of fact, but to grant a summary judgment only if no genuine dispute exists. Belflower v. Risher, Fla.App.1968, 206 So. 2d 256; McCauley v. Eastern Steamship Lines, Inc., Fla.App.1968, 211 So. 2d 72. In this posture, defendant’s contention both below and on this appeal is that inasmuch as the bolt corroded over the 10-month period, plaintiff’s loss comes within the “gradual deterioration” exception to the “all risks” policy. Plaintiff, on the…
-
E. S.S. Corp. v. Egan, 246 So. 2d 609 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971)…We have considered the other points raised by defendant on appeal and find that said defendant has failed to demonstrate reversible error and that this cause should be affirmed. Affirmed. . McCauley v. Eastern Steamship Dines, Inc., Fla.App.1968, 211 So. 2d 72.…
-
Chappelle v. Windjammer Barefoot Cruises, 499 So. 2d 873 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)…v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 351 So. 2d 29 (Fla.1977); Holl v. Talcott, 191 So. 2d 40 (Fla.1966); Eastern Steamship Corp. v. Egan, 246 So. 2d 609 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971), writ discharged, 261 So. 2d 133 (Fla.1972); McCauley v. Eastern Steamship Lines, Inc., 211 So. 2d 72 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968); Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.510(c). Reversed and remanded.…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Gory Roofing Tile Mfg., Inc. v. Davison, 191 So. 2d 40 (Fla. 1966)
- Belflower v. Risher, 206 So. 2d 256 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968)