AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY, A FOREIGN CORP., PETITIONERS,
v.
HASAN SHIHADA, SADAT UTHMAN AND ABDEL H. JODE, RESPONDENTS
AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY, A FOREIGN CORP., PETITIONERS,
HASAN SHIHADA, SADAT UTHMAN AND ABDEL H. JODE, RESPONDENTS
212 So. 2d 628
Florida Supreme Court (1968)
Opinion of the Court
On a prima facie of showing of “conflict jurisdiction” we granted certiorari and have heard oral argument.
The decision under review is Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Shihada, 196 So.2d 14 (3d D.C.A.Fla.1967). Allegedly it conflicts with Glens Falls Indemnity Co. v. Lingle, 133 So.2d 78 (2d D.C.A.Fla.1961).
On further examination of the record and briefs we have concluded that there is no jurisdictional conflict of decisions. The writ is therefore discharged.
It is so ordered.
CALDWELL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Springer v. Fla. Steel Corp., 133 So. 2d 78 (Fla. 2d DCA 1961)
- Glens Falls Indem. Co. v. Lingle, 133 So. 2d 78 (Fla. 2d DCA 1961)
- The AETNA Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Hasan Shihada, 196 So. 2d 14 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967)