THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
ARTHUR H. COURSHON, JACK R. COURSHON, JACK D. GORDON, MILTON M. GAYNOR, AND OSCAR E. HYDE, APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 1968-07-16
No. 67-965
Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.
212 So. 2d 828 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1968) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See: City of Miami Beach v. 8701 Collins Ave., Fla. 1954, 77 So.2d 428; Tollius v. City of Miami, Fla.1957, 96 So.2d 122; Burritt v. Harris, Fla.1965, 172 So.2d 820; Shearer v. Metropolitan Dade County, Fla.App.1966, 189 So.2d 501.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Gibbs v. Louie L. Wainwright, 302 So. 2d 175 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974)
    …have consistently held that a parolee whose parole had been revoked was not entitled to credit for time when he was on parole. Mayo v. Lukers, Fla.1951, 53 So. 2d 916; Deese v. Cochran, Fla. 1962, 139 So. 2d 429; Porter v. State, Fla.App.1st, 1968, 212 So. 2d 828. See also Starnes v. Connett, 5th Cir. 1972, 464 F. 2d 524, which dealt with an analogous statute. The courts of Florida have held that gain time is forfeited by operation of the provisions of § 947.23(2) F.S. whenever a parole is revoked. Dear v.…
  • City of Miami Beach v. Courshon, 219 So. 2d 699 (Fla. 1968)
    …Certiorari denied without opinion. 212 So. 2d 828.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw