PRICE ET AL.

v.

PITTSBURGH TERMINAL CORP. ET AL.; AND BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD CO. ET AL. V. PITTSBURGH TERMINAL CORP. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• McKOY v. North Carolina, 494 U.S. 433 (U.S. 1990)
  …04 S. E. 2d 184, 196 (1983). For nonstatutory mitigating circumstances, the jury must decide both whether the circumstance has been proved and whether it has mitigating value. See State v. Pinch, 306 N. C. 1, 26, 292 S. E. 2d 203, 223, cert. denied, 459 U. S. 1056 (1982), citing State v. Johnson, 298 N. C. 47, 72-74, 257 S. E. 2d 597, 616-617 (1979). In fact, this case presents an even clearer case for reversal than Mills v. Maryland, 486 U. S. 367 (1988). In Mills, the Court divided over the issue whether a…
• Adamson v. Ricketts, 865 F.2d 1011 (9th Cir. 1988)
  …sponding difference in the need for reliability in the determination that death is the appropriate punishment in a specific case. Woodson, 428 U.S. at 305, 96 S.Ct. at 2991 (footnote omitted). . Justice Stevens, writing in Smith v. North Carolina, 459 U.S. 1056, 103 S.Ct. 474, 74 L.Ed.2d 622 (1982) (opinion respecting the denial of the petition for certiorari), voiced the same objections to a North Carolina death penalty instruction that operated in a manner similar to the Arizona statute. In Smith, the ju…
• White v. Maryland, 470 U.S. 1062 (U.S. 1985)
  …on presented here, which is also presented by other state statutes, is clearly worthy of this Court’s attention. See, e. g., Maxwell v. Pennsylvania, 469 U. S. 971 (1984) (Marshall, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari); Smith v. North Carolina, 459 U. S. 1056 (1982) (Stevens, J., respecting denial of certiorari). I therefore dissent from the Court’s refusal to hear this case.…