ROBERT SHULER, A/K/A EDWARD CARTER, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed a defendant's convictions for larceny of an automobile and receiving stolen property, finding sufficient evidence to support the jury's verdict.
Yes, the appellate court found that there was sufficient competent evidence to support both convictions.
“By these consolidated appeals the appellant, defendant in the criminal court of record, seeks review of non-jury convictions finding him guilty of larceny of an automobile and receiving stolen property.”
This quote establishes the nature of the appeal and the convictions being reviewed.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe appellant was convicted in the criminal court of record for larceny of an automobile and receiving stolen property. He appealed these convictions,…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Larceny Of An Automobile cases and more on FLexlaw
By these consolidated appeals the appellant, defendant in the criminal court of record, seeks review of non-jury convictions finding him guilty of larceny of an automobile and receiving stolen property. The principle attacked on both convictions is insufficiency of evidence to support same.
Resolving all conflicts in support of the judgment of conviction and reasonable inferences therefrom [Crum v. State, Fla.App.1965, 172 So.2d 24; Walden v. State, Fla.App.1966, 191 So.2d 68; Hennessy v. State, Fla.App.1967, 198 So.2d 37] we find sufficient competent evidence to support both convictions, under the authority of MacDonald v. State, 56 Fla. 74, 47 So. 485; Kemp v. State, 146 Fla. 101, 200 So. 368; Borghese v. State, Fla.App.1963, 158 So.2d 785; Shaw v. State, Fla.App.1968, 209 So.2d 477, and do hereby affirm.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Starling v. State, 263 So. 2d 645 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972)…, Fla.App.1968, 212 So. 2d 95; Eizenman v. State, Fla.App.1961, 132 So. 2d 763. At this stage of the proceedings, all conflicts and reasonable inferences therefrom are resolved in support of the judgment of conviction. Shuler v. State, Fla.App.1968, 213 So. 2d 312; Walden v. State, Fla.App.1966, 191 So. 2d 68. And, finding substantial competent evidence to support the trial judge’s finding of guilt, we are required to affirm. Tafero v. State, Fla.App.1969, 223 So. 2d 564; Williams v. State, Fla.App.1966, 187…
-
Dreger v. State, 228 So. 2d 431 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969)…ate, Fla.App.1968, 212 So. 2d 95. At this stage of the proceeding, all conflicts and reasonable inferences therefrom are resolved in support of the judgment of conviction. Walden v. State, Fla.App.1966, 191 So. 2d 68; Shuler v. State, Fla. App.1968, 213 So. 2d 312. And, finding substantial competent evidence to support [*432] the trial judge’s finding of guilt, we are required to affirm. Williams v. State, Fla.App.1966, 187 So. 2d 913; Tafero v. State, Fla.App.1969, 223 So. 2d 564. Affirmed.…
-
Nettle v. State, 291 So. 2d 20 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)…the transaction resulting in the second transaction. There is a dispute in the record, but at this stage, the conflicts are resolved in favor of the trial court’s ruling. Walden v. State, Fla.App.1966, 191 So. 2d 68; Shuler v. State, Fla.App. 1968, 213 So. 2d 312; Starling v. State, Fla.App. 1972, 263 So. 2d 645. And, there is evidence which indicates that at the conclusion of the first sale the defendant advised the purchaser that he had an additional packet of cocaine; gave her his telephone number; and th…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Crum v. State, 172 So. 2d 24 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965)
- Angus McDonald v. State, 56 Fla. 74 (Fla. 1908)
- Sobol v. Sobol, 191 So. 2d 68 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966)
- Kemp v. State, 146 Fla. 101 (Fla. 1941)
- Benny John Borghese v. State, 158 So. 2d 785 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963)
- Hennessy v. State, 198 So. 2d 37 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967)
- Shaw v. State, 209 So. 2d 477 (Fla. 1st DCA 1968)
- Bassham v. State, 209 So. 2d 477 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968)