M. L. SAXON AND CHARLES MOORMAN, APPELLANTS,

v.

JOHN WEAVER, JR., ET AL., AS AND CONSTITUTING THE MEMBERSHIP IN THE FLORIDA PEST CONTROL COMMISSION, APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• Rural NEW Town, Inc. v. Palm Beach Cnty., 315 So. 2d 478 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975)
  …Aikin, Fla.1968, 217 So. 2d 315; Hall v. Korth, Fla.App.1971, 244 So. 2d 766; City of Miami v. Schutte, Fla.App.1972, 262 So. 2d 14; cf. Metropolitan Dade County v. Kanter, Fla.App.1967, 200 So. 2d 624; McCormick v. City of Pensacola, Fla.App.1968, 216 So. 2d 785. No useful purpose would be served by detailing the evidence presented to the Palm Beach County Commission. Suffice it to say, that the quality and character of the evidence presented by appellant was of such magnitude as to remove the continued ap…
• Metro. Dade Cnty. v. Greenlee, 224 So. 2d 781 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969)
  …ich promote the integrity of a neighborhood and preserve its residential character are related to the general welfare of the community and are valid exercises of the legislative power.” * * * * * * In McCormick v. City of Pensacola, Fla. App.1968, 216 So. 2d 785, the factual situation weighed more strongly in favor of the property owner than it does in the instant case. There, the trial court denied the prayer for relief by the property owners and they appealed. The parties were owners of lots in a develope…
• Renard v. Dade Cnty., 249 So. 2d 500 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971)
  …me, the burden is upon the one attacking a validly enacted rezoning ordinance or regulation to demonstrate that it is not fairly debatable as an exercise of the police power of the legislative body. See: McCormick v. City of Pensacola, Fla.App.1968, 216 So. 2d 785; City of St. Petersburg v. Aikin, Fla.1968, 217 So. 2d 315. Examining the record in light of these principles, it is apparent that with the recommendation of the Planning Board and the approval of the Zoning Appeals Board, the action of the County C…

Authorities Cited

• Columbia Cas. Co. v. Zimmerman, 62 So. 2d 338 (Fla. 1952)
• White v. BAY Dredging & Constr. Co., 216 So. 2d 436 (Fla. 1968)
• Bergh v. Canadian Universal Ins. Co., 216 So. 2d 436 (Fla. 1968)