DUKES

v.

PINDER

Citator

Cited By

• Emanuel v. State, 601 So. 2d 1273 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992)
  …Telegraph Co., 386 So. 2d 253 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980) (defendant admitted statements were false and court heard taped conversation of defendant); Chavez-Rey v. Chavez-Rey, 213 So. 2d 596 (Fla. 3d DCA) (defendant admitted testimony false), cert. denied, 219 So. 2d 700 (Fla.1968); Mitchell v. Parrish, 58 So. 2d 683 (Fla.1952) (judicial knowledge of the falsity requires certainty that in court statement is false). See also Annotation, Perjury or false swearing as contempt, 89 A.L.R.2d 1258 (1979). Under Coleman, t…
• Kirsh v. Mannen, 393 So. 2d 63 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
  …v. Tutten Enterprises, Inc., 343 So. 2d 902 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977); Sullivan v. Bloom, 342 So. 2d 1036 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977); Stone v. Lingerfeldt, 330 So. 2d 40 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976); Carter v. Dade County, 213 So. 2d 594 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968), cert. denied, 219 So. 2d 700 (Fla.1968); Mead v. Mead, 193 So. 2d 476 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967), cert. denied, 201 So. 2d 552 (Fla.1967); Benson v. Atwood, 177 So. 2d 380 (Fla. 1st DCA 1965); Owens v. MacKenzie, 103 So. 2d 677 (Fla. 1st DCA 1958). Reversed. . 689.07: ‘Trustee’ or…
• Martinello v. B & P USA, Inc., 566 So. 2d 761 (Fla. 1990)
  …onsequently, the court held that the jury properly considered comparative negligence. In its decision, the court acknowledged conflict with the Third District Court of Appeal’s decision in Dukes v. Pinder, 211 So. 2d 575 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 219 So. 2d 700 (Fla.1968). We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution. We quash the district court’s decision, finding that the plaintiff was entitled to choose which theory should be applied under these circumstances. A rev…

  ← 1 / 2 →