COMMERCIAL CONSTRUCTION CO., APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA BOND AND MORTGAGE COMPANY A FLORIDA CORPORATION, ET AL., APPELLEES
COMMERCIAL CONSTRUCTION CO., APPELLANT,
FLORIDA BOND AND MORTGAGE COMPANY A FLORIDA CORPORATION, ET AL., APPELLEES
220 So. 2d 675
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1969)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
The general contractor, who was made a party to this mortgage foreclosure because he filed a claim of lien, appeals from a final decree in behalf of the mortgagee. We have read the transcript and considered the briefs and conclude that the trial judge did not commit reversible error in determining from the evidence that the mortgage was in default and that the plaintiff was not estopped to foreclose.
Affirmed.
WALDEN, C. J., McCAIN, J., and TROWBRIDGE, C. PFEIFFER, Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Blaw-Knox Food & Chem. Equip. Corp. & Travelers Ins. Cos. v. Seavy L. Holmes and Agnes J. Holmes, 348 So. 2d 604 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977)…ld not differ. Loftin v. Wilson, 67 So. 2d 185 (Fla.1953). We recognize that there may be instances where the evidence is insufficient, and in those cases, the trial court may decide the issue as a matter of law, e. g., Courtney v. American Oil Co., 220 So. 2d 675 (Fla.4th DCA 1968). In the present case, we conclude that the evidence was sufficient for the issue of proximate or legal cause to be submitted to the jury. The defendants next contend that the trial court erred in not granting their motion for dir…
-
Charlotte Asphalt, Inc. v. Cape Cave Corp., 406 So. 2d 1234 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981)…(Fla. 2d DCA 1979); Baro v. Southeast First National Bank, 363 So. 2d 397 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978). If any reasonable interpretation of the evidence supports the plaintiff’s claim, the court must deny the defendant’s motion. Courtney v. American Oil Co., 220 So. 2d 675 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969). The misunderstanding concerning corporate entity expressed by Mr. Willis and Dr. Swing is common among principals in small businesses. Considering the documentary evidence and moral testimony, the record as a whole can be reaso…
-
Maxim Bramble Czellar v. Francis I. duPONT & Co., 227 So. 2d 882 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969)…ntitled to a summary judgment. Moreover we think it should be pointed out that the damages urged in argument before this court were not recoverable. Cf. Barrow v. Curtis, Fla.App.1968, 209 So. 2d 699; Courtney v. American Oil Company, Fla. App.1969, 220 So. 2d 675. Affirmed.…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence